Best books and videos RE conspirator events at Dealey Plaza

[Richard White]

Hi Fergus,

I have read about the JFK case on/off for approximately 18 years, so I'm well-aware there was a conspiracy.

Anyone who understands basic probability will know mathematically it's the most likely outcome. Either EVERY witness/person claiming conspiracy is wrong, OR there was a conspiracy. Given there are probably 500 to 1,000 witnesses suggesting conspiracy, the probability of them ALL being wrong is effectively zero.

However, I'm always learning new bits.

My personal interest is with the operators/mechanics/spotters, hence the request for resources.

[Tom Graves]

Rather than the higher-echelons of the conspiracy I am  more-interested in the events which took place on the day at DP: shooters, locations, the mysterious pools of blood, three tramps, fake secret service, people observed behind the fence, any "famous" Cubans/CIA spotted in DP photos.

May I request book/video/documentary recommendations covering the above topics?

EDIT: not interested in single gunman propaganda.

Hint: Unless the KGB or Castro's DGI gave logistical support to the sharpshooting, psychologically disturbed, self-described Marxist known as Lee Harvey Oswald, there were no "conspiracy events" in the echo chamber known as Dealey Plaza that day.

[John Iacoletti]

There are no non-fantasy books about conspiracy events that actually took place in Dealey Plaza on 11/22/63. The “conspiracies” are all conjecture and innuendo and only take place in the minds of the authors and their readers.

As is the "Oswald as a lone-nut" fantasy.

[Charles Collins]

As is the "Oswald as a lone-nut" fantasy.

There was either a conspiracy or there was no conspiracy. There is no in-between. After over sixty years there is no credible evidence of a conspiracy. A lot of us folks who believe in a lone gunman are still keeping an open mind in case any evidence of a conspiracy does surface though.

[John Mytton]

There was either a conspiracy or there was no conspiracy. There is no in-between. After over sixty years there is no credible evidence of a conspiracy. A lot of us folks who believe in a lone gunman are still keeping an open mind in case any evidence of a conspiracy does surface though.

Because of the many lies spewed by CT authors, many LNers started of as CT's but as our knowledge increased and the actual truth emerged, our opinions changed.
I feel many LNers come to these Forums to perhaps find evidence of some sort of conspiracy but as time goes on, not one CT has any answers and the endless worthless allegations go nowhere.
It's the classic Occam's razor, the totality of the evidence leads to Oswald and an alternative would require manipulation on a grand scale which as we all know is virtually impossible because in the real World people blab and/or make mistakes and when the amount of people stirring the pot is significant the chances of a plot being exposed becomes exponentially greater.
I'm willing to entertain that Oswald was coerced into doing the deed but I would need to see evidence?

JohnM

[Charles Collins]

Because of the many lies spewed by CT authors, many LNers started of as CT's but as our knowledge increased and the actual truth emerged, our opinions changed.
I feel many LNers come to these Forums to perhaps find evidence of some sort of conspiracy but as time goes on, not one CT has any answers and the endless worthless allegations go nowhere.
It's the classic Occam's razor, the totality of the evidence leads to Oswald and an alternative would require manipulation on a grand scale which as we all know is virtually impossible because in the real World people blab and/or make mistakes and when the amount of people stirring the pot is significant the chances of a plot being exposed becomes exponentially greater.
I'm willing to entertain that Oswald was coerced into doing the deed but I would need to see evidence?

JohnM

I'm willing to entertain that Oswald was coerced into doing the deed but I would need to see evidence?

Yep, that's pretty much what I was trying to say. Thanks.