Why did Oswald kill JFK?

[David Von Pein]

So, what's the point of having a discussion that goes nowhere?

Beats me. But you're in the very same "goes nowhere" boat.

[Martin Weidmann]

Beats me. But you're in the very same "goes nowhere" boat.

Only because, when I try to have an open minded discussion with a LN I always run into a wall build by people who have made up their mind and are not prepared to have an honest conversation about the actual evidence.

All I can do is keep trying until I find a reasonable LN who is open for an honest discussion.

[Tom Graves]

When I try to have an open-minded discussion with a LN I always run into a wall build by people who have made up their mind and are not prepared to have an honest conversation about the actual evidence.

How many bad guys do you figure were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the all-important cover up?

Couple hundred?

[Martin Weidmann]

How many bad guys do you figure were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the all-important cover up?

Couple hundred?

Was I talking to you?

Perhaps you missed it, but I don't care if Oswald did it alone or if there was a conspiracy.
So, why are you asking me this pathetic question?

Do you have conclusive evidence for Oswald's guilt or are you just blowing hot air?

[Jim Hawthorn]

And why are Internet CTers so anxious to have LHO completely innocent of doing any shooting on 11/22/63?

I for one don't believe that he was completely innocent - more like involved, voluntarily or not.
Even the Warren Commission knew that he part of a conspiracy (shooter or not).

[John Iacoletti]

I wonder why so many conspiracy theorists are so afraid of facing up to reasonable inferences?

"Sensible" and "reasonable" defined as "agrees with DVP".

What's curious is that you are seemingly unaware of your own bias.

[John Iacoletti]

Was I talking to you?

Graves loves to inject that strawman into every conversation.