That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge  (Read 55466 times)

Offline Steve Barber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 518
Re: That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge
« Reply #133 on: February 21, 2026, 07:31:08 PM »
      So if Haygood made his 12:35 radio transmission from the Harkness 3 wheel motorcycle, How does Harkness somehow find Euins, interview him, and then make his 12:36 radio transmission from the very same motorcycle? Tick/Tock/Tick/Tock.
     On top of that, this above chronological order does Not fit the Harkness WC Testimony. Harkness testified that he initially rode down Main St, checked around on the other side of the Triple Underpass, eventually went back to the TSBD, found Euins in the railroad yard, made his 12:36 radio transmission, took Euins to the front of the TSBD, loaded Euins into Inspector Sawyer's car, and then went and secured the back of the TSBD. This is where we see Harkness with the "No Glove Cop". And your claim is that Haygood used the Harkness motorcycle radio at 12:35 AFTER he had done all of this? Oh, and Inspector Sawyer arrived at the TSBD at 12:35. How is Euins already sitting in the back of Sawyer's car when Officer Haygood is allegedly making a 12:35 radio call from the Harkness motorcycle? This just does Not work 5 ways to Sunday. 
     Rather than going back-n-forth about how cop's calls were ID'd, I would ask that you look at the WC QA's of Haygood, Harkness, and Inspector Sawyer. It will be clear how this was done
     This Darnell snippet is very important as it also shows how crowded the Elm St Extension was when we see this "One Glove Cop" and Officer Harkness together, vs the Elm St Ext being empty when Harkness and Euins sped down it and then when Euins was sitting inside Inspector Sawyer's car. And all of this was after Harkness made his 12:36 radio transmission. What we are seeing when "One Glove Cop" and Harkness are together is happening around 12:38. Well after Officer Haygood's 12:35 radio transmission.
     I know how skeptics want to try and somehow get around ALL of this evidence, but it is clear. The "No Glove Cop" is not Officer Haygood. The real question is, who is this guy?


    Royell,  Please respond to my question, because none of what you said makes any sense: 

  My question is:  How does a number from an officer's transmission over the radio become a part of a "transcript" until someone transcribes the recording-like Bowles did for the WC?  This doesn't have anything to do with the radio Haygood is using.  Officers have a call# they use, and they give that number to the dispatcher.  So what number are you referring to? 
« Last Edit: February 21, 2026, 07:46:36 PM by Steve Barber »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5015
Re: That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge
« Reply #134 on: February 21, 2026, 08:44:16 PM »

                                 DPD OFFICER HAYGOOD WARREN COMMISSION TESTIMONY

          OFFICER HAYGOOD - "...and after talking to him and the man that was on the other side that complained he was hit by a piece of concrete from the ricochet at that time, I CALLED THE DISPATCHER and asked for squads to cover the TSBD building off".
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

           The man being referenced by Haygood as being "hit by a piece of concrete" was James Tague. Tague was standing close to the Triple Underpass and close to Haygood and his motorcycle. The above testimony proves the Haygood 12:35 radio transmission was made from his DPD motorcycle parked at the Elm St curb.
            I know skeptics find it hard to believe the MIS ID of Officer Haygood has somehow stood for 62+ years, but the MOUNTAIN OF FACTS clearly prove the "No Glove Cop" is not Officer Haygood. So much so, that the current claim now being made is that Haygood actually made his 12:35 radio transmission from another DPD Cop's motorcycle radio. This claim is immediately debunked by Officer Haygood's WC testimony. 
           So who do we think this "No Glove Cop" really is? Is it really a DPD Cop? One thing is for certain. After 62+ years, I have proven the "No Glove Cop" on the Darnell Film is NOT OFFICER HAYGOOD.   
« Last Edit: February 21, 2026, 08:45:14 PM by Royell Storing »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5015
Re: That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge
« Reply #135 on: February 21, 2026, 09:23:19 PM »

 I circled a three wheel motorcycle on the right side of a frame from the Darnell film, and the officer with one glove off is walking toward it.  Could it be that Haygood made the transmission he made at 12:35 from the circled 3-wheel motorcycle which he's walking towards? 



                          - OFFICER HAYGOOD WARREN COMMISSION TESTIMONY -

    OFFICER HAYGOOD - "The railroad yard would be located at the - - it consists of going over Elm St and back north of Elm St"

    ATTORNEY BELIN    - "What did you do when you got there?"

    OFFICER HAYGOOD - "Well, there was nothing. There was quite a few people in the area, spectators, and at that time I went back to my motorcycle it was on the street - - To The RADIO.

             Officer Haygood's WC Testimony proves he made his 12:35 police radio transmission over the radio on his own DPD motorcycle. After 62+ years, the mountain of Evidence I continue to compile proves the "No Glove Cop" on the Darnell Film is NOT Officer Haygood. Who is this man? Is he really a DPD Motorcycle Officer? Or, is he an impostor?   

 
« Last Edit: February 21, 2026, 09:25:37 PM by Royell Storing »

Offline Steve Barber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 518
Re: That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge
« Reply #136 on: February 21, 2026, 09:33:09 PM »
                          - OFFICER HAYGOOD WARREN COMMISSION TESTIMONY -

    OFFICER HAYGOOD - "The railroad yard would be located at the - - it consists of going over Elm St and back north of Elm St"

    ATTORNEY BELIN    - "What did you do when you got there?"

    OFFICER HAYGOOD - "Well, there was nothing. There was quite a few people in the area, spectators, and at that time I went back to my motorcycle it was on the street - - To The RADIO.

             Officer Haygood's WC Testimony proves he made his 12:35 police radio transmission over the radio on his own DPD motorcycle. After 62+ years, the mountain of Evidence I continue to compile proves the "No Glove Cop" on the Darnell Film is NOT Officer Haygood. Who is this man? Is he really a DPD Motorcycle Officer? Or, is he an impostor?   

 
   Ok.  I'm aware of all this, thank you. 

  However, you still haven't answered my question to you, above.

  Here it is , again-albeit corrected because of some typing errors I made:

    My question is:  How does a number from an officer's transmission over the radio become a part of a "transcript" until someone transcribes the recording-like Bowles did for the WC?  This doesn't have anything to do with the radio Haygood is using.  Officers have a call# they use, and they give that number to the dispatcher.  So what number are you referring to?
   

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5015
Re: That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge
« Reply #137 on: February 21, 2026, 09:52:17 PM »
   Ok.  I'm aware of all this, thank you. 

  However, you still haven't answered my question to you, above.

  Here it is , again-albeit corrected because of some typing errors I made:

    My question is:  How does a number from an officer's transmission over the radio become a part of a "transcript" until someone transcribes the recording-like Bowles did for the WC?  This doesn't have anything to do with the radio Haygood is using.  Officers have a call# they use, and they give that number to the dispatcher.  So what number are you referring to?
 

   You are claiming that Officer Haygood used the radio on Officer Harkness's 3 wheel motorcycle. The Haygood WC Testimony proves he used the radio on his own motorcycle parked at the Elm St curb.
    I don't know who Bowles is. I am referring to the # being cited in the WC QA's of Haygood, Harkness, and Inspector Sawyer.

Online Mitch Todd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1100
Re: That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge
« Reply #138 on: February 21, 2026, 10:53:53 PM »
   Who said anything about a "vehicle number"?
You did: "that specific motorcycle has a number that is then automatically attached..."

Offline Steve Barber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 518
Re: That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge
« Reply #139 on: February 22, 2026, 12:01:10 AM »
   You are claiming that Officer Haygood used the radio on Officer Harkness's 3 wheel motorcycle. The Haygood WC Testimony proves he used the radio on his own motorcycle parked at the Elm St curb.
    I don't know who Bowles is. I am referring to the # being cited in the WC QA's of Haygood, Harkness, and Inspector Sawyer.

 No.  I didn't "claim" that Haygood used the radio on the 3-wheeler.  I asked you, "Could it be that Haygood made the transmission he made at 12:35 from the circled 3-wheel motorcycle which he's walking towards? ", because at that time I didn't have access to his testimony.  Thanks for pointing out that he made the transmission after he returned to his own motorcycle. 

 J.C. Bowles is who transcribed channels 1 and 2 of the police recordings in 1964 for the WC.
He was the communications supervisor at the time.

 Haygood's call number was 142.
« Last Edit: February 22, 2026, 02:40:14 AM by Steve Barber »