That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge

[Royell Storing]

The sense I have is that you think "proving" that One Glove Cop is not Haygood will equal proving a conspiracy. Would it? Proving that One Glove Cop (hereinafter OGC) was an imposter cop sent to Dealey Plaza in furtherance of a conspiracy - well, yes, I suppose that would do it. But as I've said with Cliff Varnell's claim that the alignment of the clothes, back wound and throat wound is absolutely dispositive for the existence of a conspiracy, you would need to prove these things to a level of absolute, unequivocal certainty. "I've made a good case that OGC isn't Haywood" won't do it.

Stepping back from your film analysis to the broader picture, I would wonder:

1. Where did OGC come from? Surely he wasn't riding a motorcycle in the motorcade?
2. Why was OGC dressed as a motorcycle cop? What did this add to the equation? Wouldn't it greatly increase the risk of his act being discovered?
3. Why would OGC remove one glove? Do any images of Haygood or other actual motorcycle cops show one or both gloves off?
4. Wouldn't it have been rather bold of OGC to walk right between Walthers and Harkness and other, genuine motorcycle cops?
5. Is it pure coincidence that OGC looks very similar to Haygood? Surely he wasn't actually impersonating Haygood - how would the conspirators have had any idea what the real Haygood would be doing?
6. What did OGC supposedly do that was in furtherance of the conspiracy? Why were his actions worth all the risks that a fake motorcycle cop would entail?
7. Where did OGC go when his mission was accomplished? Did he escape on a motorcycle? Did anyone report seeing a motorcycle cop leaving in a car?
8. Having read Haygood's WC testimony, what did he say that you think eliminates him as OGC? If it's a matter of timing, can you really narrow down that timing to a level of precision that makes it physically impossible for OGC to be Haygood?
9. Is it possible to eliminate the possibility that OGC was an actual motorcycle cop other than Haygood?
10. Is it possible that some other misleading mistake in the testimony or evidence is responsible for whatever it is that you think proves OGC is not Haygood? Does your theory hinge on all the testimony and evidence being exactly correct?

I'm not expecting you to answer these questions here, but I think you're going to need to put your OGC claim in at least a reasonably plausible, coherent context for it to carry any weight.

   Long story short, it is physically impossible for Officer Haygood and Officer Harkness to appear together PRIOR to 12:35. This is what we see on the Darnell still frame. Haygood was back at his motorcycle making his 12:35 radio transmission and Harkness was inside the railroad yard questioning Euins. Harkness made a 12:36 radio transmission that he was on his way to the TSBD with Euins in tow. This should have been discovered 62 yrs ago.

[Tom Graves]

Long story short, it is physically impossible for Officer Haygood and Officer Harkness to appear together PRIOR to 12:35. This is what we see on the Darnell still frame. Haygood was back at his motorcycle making his 12:35 radio transmission and Harkness was inside the railroad yard questioning Euins. Harkness made a 12:36 radio transmission that he was on his way to the TSBD with Euins in tow. This should have been discovered 62 yrs ago.

dEAr SonDerfüFHer StOring,

MaYBbe yOU sHould wriTe a bOOk.

YoU coUld sELF-PubLIsH iT anD mAke miLLiOnS!


-- Tom

[Royell Storing]

I haven’t seen the footage that shows one glove missing from Michael Jackson

 

   12:35 - Motorcycle Officer Haygood makes a documented police radio transmission from his motorcycle parked on the (N) Elm St curb

   12:36 - Officer Harkness makes a documented police radio transmission that he has eyewitness Amos Euins, and they are headed for the TSBD.

   12:37 - Officer Harkness places Amos Euins in the backseat of Inspector Sawyer's parked car in front of the TSBD

   12:38 - Officer Harkness travels to the back of the TSBD. He "secures" this area.

   12 38 - Officer Harkness and the "alleged" Officer Haygood are captured together on the above Darnell Film still frame. ** The documented 12:35 Haygood radio transmission from his motorcycle parked at the (N) Elm St curb makes their being together IMPOSSIBLE. The motorcycle cop pictured above is NOT OFFICER HAYGOOD.

[Gary Hemod]

Does anybody know what Haygood is standing on at the top of the knoll when looking over the bannister wall?
How long was Haygood there and did he speak to the cop who was posted on the North East of the overpass?

[Royell Storing]

Does anybody know what Haygood is standing on at the top of the knoll when looking over the bannister wall?
How long was Haygood there and did he speak to the cop who was posted on the North East of the overpass?

   The Cabluck Photo shows Officer Haygood standing on a section of concrete below the wooden fencing. Use the "Photo Gallery" posted here to look at it.
   Officer Haygood gave Warren Commission testimony that after entering the railroad yard, he saw a man he "presumed" to be a railroad detective. Haygood said nothing about talking with the cop posted on the North East of the overpass.
    The Motorcycle Cop we see inside the railroad yard on the Darnell/Martin Films is NOT OFFICER HAYGOOD. The timelines of Officer Haygood and Officer Harkness make it impossible for the 2 of them to be filmed back there before 12:35. 12:35 is when Officer Haygood made a documented police radio transmission from his motorcycle parked at the Elm St Curb.