JFK's Dramatic Z226-232 Reaction: More Proof that the SBT Is a Silly Myth

[Tom Graves]

You conjure up a giant strawman scenario and then proceed from there. But you never try to explain the hard scientific evidence that proves the autopsy x-rays were altered, that proves the autopsy report was falsified, that proves that the ammo that hit JFK's head could not have been FMJ ammo, that proves that the SBT is fiction, that proves that the brain in the autopsy brain photos could not be JFK's brain, that proves the 6.5 mm object was ghosted onto the AP x-ray, etc., etc. Autopsy skull x-rays do not alter themselves. Brains do not go missing by themselves. Autopsy reports don't go through four drafts by themselves. FMJ bullets do not magically deposit fragments on the outer table of the skull when they strike the skull, and those fragments don't magically move around by themselves so that they're not even at the point of impact. Fragment trails do not disappear by themselves. Fragment trails don't fabricate their own non-existence. Ghosted images made to look like bullet fragments don't magically appear by themselves. Autopsy skull x-rays don't magically acquire a ghosted image made to look like a bullet fragment by themselves.

What's your "proof" that the autopsy X-rays were altered?

What's your "proof" that the autopsy report was falsified?

What's your "proof" that the Single Bullet Hypothesis is a fiction?

Plus:

1) How do you explain the Backyard Photos which show Oswald holding the Carcano that was found on the sixth floor of the TSBD?

2) How do you explain Oswald's leaving his wedding ring at Mrs. Paine's house that morning?

3) How do you explain Buell Wesley Frazier's and Linnie Mae Randle's seeing Oswald carry a long package that morning?

4) How do you explain Oswald's palm print and fingerprints on the Carcano?

5) How do you explain the three shells found on the Sniper's Nest floor that had marks from Oswald's Carcano?

6) How do you explain the fact that two of them were close together under the window, but the third one was off far to the shooter's right?

7) How do you explain the fact that most of the witnesses heard three shots that came from the general direction of the TSBD?

8 ) How do you explain the fact that the first shot missed everything?

9) How do you explain JBC's distinctly hearing a rifle shot before he was hit?

10) How do you explain the first shot's sounding differently than the second and the third shot to many of the witnesses?

11) How do you explain the elliptical wound in JBC's back?

12) How do you explain the nature of the wound to JBC's wrist?

13) How do you explain the fact that CE-399, which had the Carcano's marks on it, was so strangely deformed and had no damage to its nose?

14) How do you explain the puffing-outward of JBC's jacket in Z-223 and the flapping of his lapel in Z-224?

15) How do you explain JFK's reacting "so quickly" compared to JBC's reacting "so slowly"?

16) How do you explain Howard Brennan's and Amos Euins' seeing a man fire from the Sniper's Nest window?

17) How do you explain JFK's head's going forward and down about 2.25 inches between Z-312 and Z-313?

18) How do you explain the Carcano's ballistics marks on the two large bullet fragments found in the limo?

19) How did a bullet fired from The Grassy Knoll cause JFK's head to go back and to his left but not wound Jackie or damage the interior of the limo behind her?

20) How do you explain the fact that even the crummy Knotts Lab analysis showed that the bullet that struck JFK in the back had a downward trajectory?

21) How do you explain Oswald's not hanging around the TSBD to be included in the informal roll call?

22) How do you explain Oswald's getting out of Whaley's taxi about three blocks past his rooming house?

23) How you explain Oswald's prints on the paper bag?

24) How do you explain Oswald's prints on two of the four functional boxes in the Sniper's Nest?

25) How many bad guys and really, really bad gals do you think were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, the escaping, and the all-important cover-up? Fifty? More than fifty?

26) My favorite: Whether or not the KGB trained or programmed Oswald to be an assassin, how do you explain the fact that all of the incoming non-CIA (e.g., State, Navy) cables on his defection were routed to probable KGB mole Bruce Leonard Solie's office in the mole-hunting Office of Security instead of where they normally would have gone -- the Soviet Russia Division -- and why did they all disappear into a "black hole" there for at least six weeks -- with some of them not reappearing until after the assassination?

[Royell Storing]

  So You want proof that the, "Single Bullet HYPOTHESIS is a Fiction"? You got the "burden of proof" Backward.

[Jack Nessan]

  So You want proof that the, "Single Bullet HYPOTHESIS is a Fiction"? You got the "burden of proof" Backward.

Thomas Canning's testimony proves SBT. You are unable to prove there even was a third shot.

[Royell Storing]

Thomas Canning's testimony proves SBT. You are unable to prove there even was a third shot.

   Do you really want to challenge there being a "third shot"?  Do you have an issue with the "3 Hulls" on the floor of the sniper's nest?

[Tom Graves]

Do you really want to challenge there being a "third shot"?  Do you have an issue with the "3 Hulls" on the floor of the sniper's nest?

Storing,

Why were two of the hulls found close together under the window and the other one found far to the shooter's right?

[Jack Nessan]

   Do you really want to challenge there being a "third shot"?  Do you have an issue with the "3 Hulls" on the floor of the sniper's nest?

Not even going to try and prove there was a third shot? Pretending to be a squid and trying to ink the water to get away? Three shells do not mean anything at all.

How about explain the rationale to your sudden change of conspiracies. You are a huge proponent of the Knotts Lab fiasco because it suggests two shooters with one trajectory from outer space and a bullet that goes through JFK and then disappears. Now you are a proponent of all three shots having been taken from the SN and forget the Knotts Lab debacle, because there were three shell casings found there? Seriously, can you track a thought from one sentence to the next?

 

[Steve M. Galbraith]

Not even going to try and prove there was a third shot? Pretending to be a squid and trying to ink the water to get away? Three shells do not mean anything at all.

How about explain the rationale to your sudden change of conspiracies. You are a huge proponent of the Knotts Lab fiasco because it suggests two shooters with one trajectory from outer space and a bullet that goes through JFK and then disappears. Now you are a proponent of all three shots having been taken from the SN and forget the Knotts Lab debacle, because there were three shell casings found there? Seriously, can you track a thought from one sentence to the next?

I guess his grassy knoll/fence shooter was thrown under the conspiracy bus? Gordon Arnold and all? The rear exit wound witnesses? Gonna' need a bigger bus eventually.

It's a conspiracy cafeteria where conspiracy believers take one of that and one of those and maybe a couple of those over there and create their conspiracy meal. It's all at odds with one another, contradictory and illogical. But it doesn't have to make sense; it just has to fit into whatever conspiracy du jour they are having that day.

Rube Goldberg scheme, conspiracy cafeteria..whatever analogy you want to use. They just grab stuff and run with it. It doesn't matter whether it contradicts what they said yesterday.