JFK's Dramatic Z226-232 Reaction: More Proof that the SBT Is a Silly Myth

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: JFK's Dramatic Z226-232 Reaction: More Proof that the SBT Is a Silly Myth  (Read 86957 times)

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
    • SPMLaw
Re: JFK's Dramatic Z226-232 Reaction: More Proof that the SBT Is a Silly Myth
« Reply #119 on: September 29, 2025, 07:00:03 PM »
 
   Really? So NOW we will rely on the Eyewitness account of SA Hickey?
I have not seen any reason not to rely on SA Hickey's account - especially when what he describes is exactly what one sees in the zfilm after z255.  We know that Hickey had not turned around by z254-55 since he is seen in the Altgens' 6 photo still looking rearward. He said he turned around forward looking at JFK at the time of the last two shots.  His recollection of the timing of those shots fits the recollections of 80% of the witnesses who recalled the relative spacing of the shots (the 80% recalling the last two close together).  What Hickey recalled seeing on the second shot was that it seemed to miss JFK because the only thing that he observed at the time of the second shot was the hair on the right side of JFK's head flying forward (18H762):

  • "...I heard two reports which I thought were shots and that appeared to me completely different in sound than the first report and were in such rapid succession that there seemed to be practically no time element between them.  It looked to me as if the President was struck in the right upper rear of his head . The first shot of the second two seemed as if it missed because the hair on the right side of his head flew forward and there didn't seem to be any impact against his head.  The last shot seemed to hit his head and cause a noise at the point of impact which made him fall forward and to his left again."

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5010
Re: JFK's Dramatic Z226-232 Reaction: More Proof that the SBT Is a Silly Myth
« Reply #120 on: September 29, 2025, 09:22:08 PM »
JFK isn't "reacting" at all prior to Z226. The HSCA's "Z190" SBT timeline is total nonsense and totally wrong. President Kennedy's right hand is still being LOWERED between Z224 and 225:



Connally's and Kennedy's right arms are then simultaneously moving upward between 225 and 226. And Connally was struck in his RIGHT wrist during the shooting. Just a coincidence? If so, what's causing this rapid up-then-down movement of the exact same arm/wrist that was wounded by a bullet?



CTers have come up with all kinds of lame-ass excuses to explain away all of the many things we see going on with Governor Connally in Zapruder frames 224 to 230 [GO HERE to see about a dozen such excuses], but sensible people can easily see through the B.S. and constant denial being exhibited by the conspiracy theorists.

Re: the HSCA's absurd "11-degree upward angle" of the bullet path through JFK's upper back and neck....

http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2010/07/jfk-back-wound-location.html

   Gov Connally is turning his entire upper torso to his (R) within the very confined space between himself and the car door panel. This is why he is swinging his (R) arm around. What we are seeing with Connally's (R) arm is merely an anatomical certainty. Proffering something such as this to prove the SBT only makes plain how absurd this 61+ year old THEORY is.   

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
    • SPMLaw
Re: JFK's Dramatic Z226-232 Reaction: More Proof that the SBT Is a Silly Myth
« Reply #121 on: October 01, 2025, 10:49:08 PM »
Proffering something such as this to prove the SBT only makes plain how absurd this 61+ year old THEORY is.

I have to agree with you that David's suggestion that JFK is not reacting until z226 is difficult to accept.  The difference between z193 and z225 (less than 2 seconds) is striking:


In z193 he is smiling and waving but by z225 he looks like he is posing for an Edvard Munch portrait.