What's the worst JFK assassination related book you ever came across?

[Jon Banks]

Worst - The Hidden History of the JFK Assassination by Lamar Waldron

Best - Accessories After The Fact by Sylvia Meagher

[Paul May]

Any book, repeat ANY book by Jim DiEugenio.

[Paul May]

How about some of the best books that deal with the JFK assassination conspiracy?

JFK Assassination Paradoxes (re-released last year as The JFK Assassination Decoded), by Dr. David Mantik.
Not In Your Lifetime, by Anthony Summers.
The Last Investigation, by Gaeton Fonzi.
Inside the Assassination Records Review Board, by Doug Horne.
Breach of Trust, by Dr. Gerald McKnight.

The worst pro-conspiracy books:

Plausible Denial, by Mark Lane.
Files on JFK: Interviews with Confessed Assassin James E. Files, by Wim Dankbaar.
JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy, by L. Fletcher Prouty.

The worst pro-Warren Commission books:

Reclaiming History, by Vincent Bugliosi.
Case Closed, by Gerald Posner.
November 22, 1963: You Are the Jury, by David Belin.
JFK, Oswald and Ruby: Politics, Prejudice and Truth, by Burt Griffin.

Horne? Laughable.

[Mark A. Oblazney]

The book's premise was that Mary was murdered by a CIA "wet work" operative who had attempted to frame Raymond Crump in her shooting because "Mary knew too much!"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Pinchot_Meyer

Mary's Mosaic: The CIA Conspiracy to Murder John F. Kennedy, ...
books.google.com › books
Peter Janney · 2016
Found inside
"... Georgia law professor, Scully identified himself as “a moderator at the Internet forum, JFK Debate, created by John Simkin.”2 Mr. Scully focused his attack on the conclusions I had presented about the prosecution witness William L ..."

I "dug my own grave," in the CT "community".

The author of the book's friend, Douglas Horne, "lashed out" in reaction to the unwelcome facts I presented.



Horne's friend, book author Peter Janney confirmed in the revised edition of his book. forced by my research results, that I had not concealed who I was by naming me in his attempt to discredit me because he could not counter the facts I discovered that had dismantled his fairy tale.

Just came from Peter's Wiki bio page, Tom.  Gosh, they mentioned me, but forgot about you.  Your gatherings are always worthy of perusal+

[Fergus O'Brien]

Any book, repeat ANY book by Jim DiEugenio.

have you actually read his jfk assassination books ? . i know LN often dont read so called CT material . even (and i am going from memory here ) Mr von pien in debate with Jim di eugenio refused point blank to view or even read any of the books , resources etc that Jim provided in that debate that supported his claims (i dont remember if the debate was here on this forum or the ed forum ) . Mr von pien posted in essence that he has absolutely no interest in reading ANYTHING that is CT related . and LN very often complain that CT dont read LN material such as the warren report or reclaiming history lol , that is quite a large slice of LN hypocrisy dont you think ? . but this is hardly surprising .

[John Mytton]

have you actually read his jfk assassination books ? . i know LN often dont read so called CT material . even (and i am going from memory here ) Mr von pien in debate with Jim di eugenio refused point blank to view or even read any of the books , resources etc that Jim provided in that debate that supported his claims (i dont remember if the debate was here on this forum or the ed forum ) . Mr von pien posted in essence that he has absolutely no interest in reading ANYTHING that is CT related . and LN very often complain that CT dont read LN material such as the warren report or reclaiming history lol , that is quite a large slice of LN hypocrisy dont you think ? . but this is hardly surprising .

David may have no interest in reading books full of unproven CT garbage but he is eminently familiar with all their arguments, and he has debated James DiEugenio on over a hundred occasions and considering that DiEugenio constantly referenced his arguments that David consistently refuted, proves that reading a few books full of misrepresentations and made up nonsense, wasn't going to add any more relevant information.

Just check out the following link and see James DiEugenio being repeatedly outargued by David.

https://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2011/04/dvp-vs-dieugenio-complete-series.html

And after you finish reading through the debates in the above link, then check out the rest of David's web site which is literally filled to the brim with interesting JFK facts, videos and photos. And you can also read the rest of the CT's that David has debated, which goes on for well over one thousand and three hundred pages.

https://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/

JohnM

[Royell Storing]

 "...unproven CT garbage"? When do we get into, "Unproven LN garbage"? Such as the 60 yr old SBT which SCIENCE has just proven is "IMPOSSIBLE"?

[Fergus O'Brien]

David may have no interest in reading books full of unproven CT garbage but he is eminently familiar with all their arguments, and he has debated James DiEugenio on over a hundred occasions and considering that DiEugenio constantly referenced his arguments that David consistently refuted, proves that reading a few books full of misrepresentations and made up nonsense, wasn't going to add any more relevant information.

Just check out the following link and see James DiEugenio being repeatedly outargued by David.

https://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2011/04/dvp-vs-dieugenio-complete-series.html

And after you finish reading through the debates in the above link, then check out the rest of David's web site which is literally filled to the brim with interesting JFK facts, videos and photos. And you can also read the rest of the CT's that David has debated, which goes on for well over one thousand and three hundred pages.

https://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/

JohnM

"David may have no interest in reading books full of unproven CT garbage " Mr mytton

lol ok . so now no LN (that includes you ) should ever complain and say CT dont read the warren port yet they attack it , in essence how can CT attack a book if they have not studied it . that is the oft used line by LN yes ? . because you condone this very behavior in your fellow LN . David condones it when he readily admitted that he refuses to read , debate evidence or facts detailed in books and resources that he said are CT books and sources . i expect hypocrisy from LN , and i usually get it , and that is the case here now .

familiar with arguments ? how might one (an LN) being familiar with certain arguments possibly refute , debunk or disprove information in books and resources that they have never seen , never read , and have no intentions of reading ? . atleast Jim can say both that he studied Bugliosis book and that wrote a detailed book on it and its author .

i get that you think any CT is a novice and knows very little , i know you and your online persona quite well , and likewise with Mr von pien . so i am well aware of both you and him and his site .and i have seen many debates between LN and CT here and on other forums . i am no novice , but thank you for the information .  it is humorous that both you and he are bugliosi apostles ., given A that he as we know was of the opinion that there was a conspiracy in the rfk assassination , and B that he wanted good old boy GW charged with crimes relating to his fraudulent iraq war . i have seen you asked about this , i believe it was Martin only quite recently that mentioned this (but as i am going from memory i stand to be corrected on that ) but to my knowledge you did not discuss it with him . so what are your views on bugliosi the CT ? .