Vicki Adams: The Lost Interview

[Martin Weidmann]

This get's curiouser and curiouser, here's an excerpt from Ernest's book of what Garner apparently actually said!

Mrs. Garner said she immediately went to this area, following
"shortly after…right behind" Miss Adams and Miss Styles.   She
couldn't remember exactly why she went out there, other than to say,
"probably to get something."

So Garner decides at the exact time that she realized that Adams and Styles were gone, to leave her prime spot and get this, she couldn't remember why she suddenly had to leave at that precise time, but she guesses she probably went to get "something" and thereafter didn't go back to the front windows but instead just stood alone at the back of the building??

And let's put this in perspective, she knew that some dramatic event perhaps involving the President just happened right before her very eyes, and instead of spending a little time trying to work out what happened, she leaves within moments for some reason and goes to get some unspecified "something"? Far out Brussel Spout, what a load of rubbish!

Btw, the above quote came from the next paragraph after your previous quote from Ernest's book so you must have known what Garner said about why she followed Adams and Styles, and I perfectly understand why you tried to keep her crazy excuse a complete secret. Oops!

JohnM

Oh how low this LN is willing to sink. Garner was interviewed by Ernest in 2011, a year before her death, and you expect that old lady to remember everything to the smallest detail?
When asked she said she didn't remember. Only a creep like you would call something like that suspicious.

Garner did really get under your skin, didn't she! Great stuff...

[John Mytton]

Oh how low this LN is willing to sink. Garner was interviewed by Ernest in 2011, a year before her death, and you expect that old lady to remember everything to the smallest detail?
When asked she said she didn't remember. Only a creep like you would call something like that suspicious.

Garner did really get under your skin, didn't she! Great stuff...

When asked she said she didn't remember.

Interesting, then how can we trust any of her memories? LOL!

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

It's too late Martin, Adams story as in the WC and confirmed in the OP video, is provably wrong!
You lose!

JohnM

Run John run....

I'll leave you with this; I did not write any of my replies to your BS posts to try and convince you of anything, because it was clear from the outset that it would be impossible to do with a LN. I wrote the posts for other, far more reasonable readers than you, to show them just how far you would go with your usual BS to try and salvage your pathetic fairytale. It worked.

The irony of it all is that you have now resorted to calling two women, who had nothing to gain and were merely witnesses to a minor part of the case, liars and as a result you have accused them of conspiring to tell the same story decades after the event. Are you proud of yourself?

Oh, and let's not forget that you have also demonstrated beyond any reasonable doubt that you can not provide a shred of evidence that shows Oswald was on the stairs at all! Well done 

[Martin Weidmann]

Interesting, then how can we trust any of her memories? LOL!

JohnM

By checking the key information, about Adams and Styles going down before Truly and Baker came up, against what she remembered on that particular point. And she was very clear about exactly that, some 5 decades later, even if she couldn't remember why she went out there.

[Martin Weidmann]

You're not very good at this are you!

My statement of "up to 30 seconds" automatically encapsulates 15 seconds. Duh!

JohnM

It is still a misrepresentation of what Adams actually said. But even if her estimate was correct and it was 30 seconds (quod non), that still means the women would be at the stairs on the 4th floor before somebody coming from the 6th floor could get there.

The case you are desperately trying to defend here is puzzle with a great many pieces missing. You will never ever be able to present even a remotely plausible timeline for the events involving Adams/Styles and Shelley/Lovelady between 12:30 and 12:36, but I nevertheless challenge you to give it a try.

[John Mytton]

Run John run....

I'll leave you with this; I did not write any of my replies to your BS posts to try and convince you of anything, because it was clear from the outset that it would be impossible to do with a LN. I wrote the posts for other, far more reasonable readers than you, to show them just how far you would go with your usual BS to try and salvage your pathetic fairytale. It worked.

The irony of it all is that you have now resorted to calling two women, who had nothing to gain and were merely witnesses to a minor part of the case, liars and as a result you have accused them of conspiring to tell the same story decades after the event. Are you proud of yourself?

Oh, and let's not forget that you have also demonstrated beyond any reasonable doubt that you can not provide a shred of evidence that shows Oswald was on the stairs at all! Well done 

Give it up Martin, you've been back pedalling ever since Adams own voice confirmed that after she came down from the 4th floor and she saw Lovelady and Shelley on the 1st floor and years of CT claims about the WC altering evidence has gone up in flames, Wake up and smell the air of Truth!

 

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Give it up Martin, you've been back pedalling ever since Adams own voice confirmed that after she came down from the 4th floor and she saw Lovelady and Shelley on the 1st floor and years of CT claims about the WC altering evidence has gone up in flames, Wake up and smell the air of Truth!

 

JohnM

Wake up and smell the air of Truth!

The air of Truth in your neck of the wood smells like manure.

But I take it this means you would be providing us with a plausible timeline of the events between 12:30 and 12:36 or evidence that Oswald was actually was on the stairs at all?

Says it all, really...