RIP to the Single-bullet theory?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?  (Read 163891 times)

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #189 on: September 16, 2023, 12:37:33 AM »
The original is available at the archives. If you think that the corrections prove your idea, feel free to check it out and let us know.

     Would you want notes taken during Oswald's numerous interrogations to be "Corrected"?  This is the same kinda stuff that went on with Humes and his notes.  Plus, your now damaging your own source.

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #190 on: September 16, 2023, 01:38:31 AM »
     Would you want notes taken during Oswald's numerous interrogations to be "Corrected"?  This is the same kinda stuff that went on with Humes and his notes.  Plus, your now damaging your own source.

It appears to me that the corrections are listed at the bottom of each page. Here’s an example from the bottom of page 1:

*Capitalization as appears in original.

There are similar corrections on numerous pages. These are obviously typographical errors.

You can find the complete document at the Sixth Floor Museum website. Here’s a link. Check it out for yourself.

https://www.jfk.org/wp-content/uploads/Howard-Willens-WC-Journal-1964.pdf


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #191 on: September 16, 2023, 02:13:34 AM »
It appears to me that the corrections are listed at the bottom of each page. Here’s an example from the bottom of page 1:

*Capitalization as appears in original.

There are similar corrections on numerous pages. These are obviously typographical errors.

You can find the complete document at the Sixth Floor Museum website. Here’s a link. Check it out for yourself.

https://www.jfk.org/wp-content/uploads/Howard-Willens-WC-Journal-1964.pdf

    After my spit-shine observation, you reveal that his real "contemporaneous" notes are buried somewhere in The Archives. Now, the "complete DOCUMENT" is available via the Sixth Floor Museum website? There is Only 1 "contemporaneous" DOCUMENT.  This DOCUMENT can not be in 2 places at the same time. As I mentioned earlier, this is right out of the Dr Humes autopsy notes dodge.     

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #192 on: September 16, 2023, 02:24:17 AM »
    After my spit-shine observation, you reveal that his real "contemporaneous" notes are buried somewhere in The Archives. Now, the "complete DOCUMENT" is available via the Sixth Floor Museum website? There is Only 1 "contemporaneous" DOCUMENT.  This DOCUMENT can not be in 2 places at the same time. As I mentioned earlier, this is right out of the Dr Humes autopsy notes dodge.   


Are you going to back up your claim, or just play the suspicions and innuendo game? Sixty years of suspicions and innuendo have only made the CT community look ridiculous.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #193 on: September 16, 2023, 02:32:59 AM »

Are you going to back up your claim, or just play the suspicions and innuendo game? Sixty years of suspicions and innuendo have only made the CT community look ridiculous.

   Nice try. YOUR claim was these were "contemporaneous" notes you were posting. By your own admission, what you posted has been sanitized. Truth in advertising needs to be adhered to.

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #194 on: September 16, 2023, 02:40:14 AM »
   Nice try. YOUR claim was these were "contemporaneous" notes you were posting. By your own admission, what you posted has been sanitized. Truth in advertising needs to be adhered to.

A journal kept contemporaneously that has some typographical errors corrected. Your suspicions and innuendo about something being “sanitized” are ridiculous. Anyone who wants to believe your nutty idea can review the original document in the archives. Apparently you aren’t willing to back up any of your ridiculous claims.

Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1400
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #195 on: September 16, 2023, 02:14:27 PM »
« Last Edit: September 16, 2023, 02:15:20 PM by Jon Banks »