JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Who do you believe?
Colin Crow:
--- Quote from: Wesley Johnson on March 12, 2018, 10:11:40 PM ---
"The WC defender argument is that Oswald stated he ate his lunch in the domino room with Jr and a short guy, believed to be Jarman and Norman, when asked by Fritz.
What possible reason would Oswald have do such a thing when it was so easily disproven? "
It seems you have difficulty in making clear statements. Are you saying he didn't tell Fritz he had lunch with Jr and a short guy on the first floor or are you saying he didn't tell Fritz he had lunch on the first floor at all? Be clear man. ;D
"What possible reason would Oswald have do such a thing when it was so easily disproven? "
What part is so easily disproven for you? I'm glad to see you admit that Oswald's lies were so easily disproven.
--- End quote ---
How much clearer do you need. How's this?
If Oswald claimed to be in the lunchroom eating his lunch with Jarman and Norman (not the short 6?2? Givens).
According to Fritz Oswald said he was having lunch with them when the President was shot.
What was the question he was responding to?
Tim Nickerson:
--- Quote from: Colin Crow on March 12, 2018, 12:52:24 AM ---I do not dispute that he lied about purchasing the weapons, or anything that related to his possession of them eg the photos and Neely St. One could argue that he might have believed that it would not be possible to trace them to him so easily. The package is not so clear cut as you know. However if you are correct....
all this stuff is so obviously indisputable......why not simply confess? Why try and make such an obviously disprovable claim? One that just so happens to have been possible if the wording of his answer was "pass by" the lunchroom and not "pass through".
Then again no verbatim transcript exists so we were never afforded the opportunity to determine for ourselves.
--- End quote ---
What makes the package any less clear cut than the rest of the stuff? Frazier and Linnie Mae both said that Oswald carried a long package with him that morning. Oswald denied it.
Alice Thorton:
This has nothing to do with what you're asking, but I believe that LBJ and his associates hired Oswald to be the decoy and that Mac Wallace was the one who really shot JFK. In 1998 I believe was the year they found the fingerprint of Wallace in the Depository of where Oswald supposedly shot Kennedy.
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Bill Brown on March 11, 2018, 08:48:19 AM ---For the record, at the time he attended the lineup, Brennan did pick Oswald as most resembling the man (of all the lineup "suspects") who he saw in the window.
While this may not be a proof positive identification, it is also inaccurate to state that Brennan did not identify Oswald in the lineup.
--- End quote ---
Not inaccurate at all. The one of the four who "most resembled" who he saw is NOT the same as identifying Oswald as the one he saw.
Besides, that is specifically not what you're supposed to be instructed to do in a lineup.
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Richard Smith on March 12, 2018, 01:50:30 PM ---Yes, old Lee took his over two-foot long lunch bag to the lunchroom and had a leisurely meal while the motorcade drove by. He, the most politically minded person in the entire workforce who had read JFK's book, had no interest whatsoever in the president driving by that day.
--- End quote ---
Only in Richard's fantasy world is this somehow "evidence" of murder.
--- Quote --- And his fingerprints showing up on the SN boxes by the very window from which the shots were fired, just another wild streak of bad luck.
--- End quote ---
A guy whose job was to get books out of boxes left fingerprints on book boxes. How unlikely.
--- Quote --- And after going to the considerable risk to frame Oswald for this crime, of course the conspirators would just let him roam about in the public parts of the building like a lunchroom where he could very well have been seen (as CTers allege here) and been given an alibi. Thankfully the person who did see him decided to hold off a decade or so to tell her story. That is the kind of lunacy that you are dealing with here.
--- End quote ---
And there you go again with the "fantasy conspirators" strawman.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version