JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate

Who do you believe?

<< < (20/27) > >>

Martin Weidmann:

--- Quote from: Richard Smith on March 12, 2018, 04:00:50 PM ---
Nice substantive contribution as usual.  How about you start with explaining a plan that involves considerable risk and preparation to frame Oswald as the assassin but then allows him to wander the building freely and eat lunch at the crucial moment.  In which location, he might encounter and be given an alibi by anyone.  Does this sound to you like something your fantasy conspirators would just leave to chance?  The most critical part of the plan.  Oswald's location at the moment of the assassination.  Suppose Oswald had done the obvious thing like most of his co-workers and gone outside to watch the motorcade pass?  And been photographed or yucked it up with Buell on the steps and have an iron clad alibi while his prints and gun are planted on the 6th floor.  Ridiculous.  You should be ashamed.

--- End quote ---

Who are those "fantasy conspirators" you keep rambling on about?

Martin Weidmann:

--- Quote from: Wesley Johnson on March 12, 2018, 04:01:57 PM ---

And nobody is asking you to deal with anything, or stay either Martin. And if my "open ended questions" as you call them, bother you don't respond. The question on here is "Who do you believe? Oswald or Arnold?" And typical of you, you never answer anything. All you are is "woulda, shouda, couda."

--- End quote ---

I don't call your questions "open ended" and I did answer your question.... but I did so in a way that you don't like and so you ignore it... Go and play chess with Richard Smith. The two of you should get on like a house on fire.

Wesley Johnson:

--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on March 12, 2018, 04:13:21 PM ---I don't call your questions "open ended" and I did answer your question.... but I did so in a way that you don't like and so you ignore it... Go and play chess with Richard Smith. The two of you should get on like a house on fire.

--- End quote ---

What's up with the chess deal with you? I told you I will play you anytime you like. You didn't really answer the question. You walked the fence just like so many CTers do on here.

Colin Crow:

--- Quote from: Wesley Johnson on March 12, 2018, 03:55:14 PM ---So are you saying Oswald never said he had lunch on the first floor? Really? If you do Colin then my next question for you is, "Are you saying all of the men that were in the interrogation room were part of a conspiracy?" LOL That would include Capt. Fritz who was a fine lawman. So are you claiming Capt. Fritz was part of a conspiracy?

--- End quote ---

You seem to have trouble intepreting what I wrote. Go back and read again.

Wesley Johnson:

--- Quote from: Colin Crow on March 12, 2018, 09:08:06 PM ---You seem to have trouble intepreting what I wrote. Go back and read again.

--- End quote ---


"The WC defender argument is that Oswald stated he ate his lunch in the domino room with Jr and a short guy, believed to be Jarman and Norman, when asked by Fritz.

What possible reason would Oswald have do such a thing when it was so easily disproven? "

It seems you have difficulty in making clear statements. Are you saying he didn't tell Fritz he had lunch with Jr and a short guy on the first floor or are you saying he didn't tell Fritz he had lunch on the first floor at all? Be clear man.  ;D

"What possible reason would Oswald have do such a thing when it was so easily disproven? "

What part is so easily disproven for you? I'm glad to see you admit that Oswald's lies were so easily disproven.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version