The Walker Case

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The Walker Case  (Read 125956 times)

Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1400
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #147 on: July 10, 2023, 08:50:44 PM »

Lame excuse #1:

I'm not making any "excuses".  I'm pointing out the obvious lack of conclusive evidence implicating LHO in the attempted murder of General Walker. 

If you know of any evidence that puts Oswald at the Walker crime scene and directly connects him to the crime, please share it.

Otherwise, it's just speculation...

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #148 on: July 10, 2023, 09:08:47 PM »
I'm not making any "excuses".  I'm pointing out the obvious lack of conclusive evidence implicating LHO in the attempted murder of General Walker. 

If you know of any evidence that puts Oswald at the Walker crime scene and directly connects him to the crime, please share it.

Otherwise, it's just speculation...

Marina’s testimony, supported by the physical evidence (note, photos, bullet) directly connects LHO to the crime.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #149 on: July 10, 2023, 09:39:33 PM »
Marina’s testimony, supported by the physical evidence (note, photos, bullet) directly connects LHO to the crime.

But the note, photos, and bullet don’t connect anybody to any crime. So you’re left with Marina said so. And she wasn’t there.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #150 on: July 10, 2023, 09:41:34 PM »
All that is required is for the person who found it to identify it. This was done.

Really? Where can we find his testimony to that effect?

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #151 on: July 10, 2023, 10:53:31 PM »
But the note, photos, and bullet don’t connect anybody to any crime. So you’re left with Marina said so. And she wasn’t there.

Again, Marina’s testimony is supported by the physical evidence. And the physical evidence is supported by Marina’s testimony. Together they most definitely connect LHO to the crime. A jury would have to consider all of the evidence. This would be to help insure a fair trial. If we want to give the case a fair shake, we should keep this in mind when forming opinions.

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #152 on: July 10, 2023, 10:58:23 PM »
Really? Where can we find his testimony to that effect?


Did I say anything about any testimony? There is an FBI report that you directed me to, CE 2010 if I remember correctly. This is what the WC asked for. It was their investigation.

Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1400
Re: The Walker Case
« Reply #153 on: July 10, 2023, 11:01:59 PM »
Again, Marina’s testimony is supported by the physical evidence. And the physical evidence is supported by Marina’s testimony. Together they most definitely connect LHO to the crime. A jury would have to consider all of the evidence. This would be to help insure a fair trial. If we want to give the case a fair shake, we should keep this in mind when forming opinions.

By "physical evidence", do you mean the rifle and bullet? The evidence around bullet in the Walker case is inconclusive and of course, no one saw Oswald with a rifle at the crime scene.

Marina's claim that Lee tried to kill Nixon also lacked corroborating evidence. Because of that and other inconsistencies, any Defense attorney would've been able to shoot holes in her testimony (if she were allowed to testify against her husband).

------------------------

The bullet used in the attempted shooting of Walker was probably not the same type as those used in the JFK assassination. According to various newspaper accounts (e.g. ‘Walker Escapes Assassin’s Bullet’, New York Times, 12 April 1963, p.12), the Dallas police claimed that the bullet was a 30.06 calibre; the bullet shells from the Texas School Book Depository were 6.5mm. The Walker bullet was too severely deformed to allow a conclusive analysis of its pattern of grooves. A spectrographic examination by Henry Heilberger of the FBI laboratory found that the lead alloy in the bullet was different from that of bullet fragments found in President Kennedy’s car (FBI HQ JFK Assassination File, 62–109060–22).

The Walker bullet had been fired from a rifle powerful enough to send it through brickwork, which the Mannlicher–Carcano rifle was not. There is no evidence that Oswald ever had access to such a rifle.

Not only did the bullet and rifle have no association with Lee Harvey Oswald, but Edwin Walker was adamant that Commission Exhibit 573, the bullet offered in evidence, was not the one he had examined at the time of the shooting; see Justice Department Criminal Division File 62–117290–1473 for Walker’s correspondence with the Justice Department on this matter.


http://22november1963.org.uk/did-lee-oswald-shoot-general-edwin-walker