One of the most important books in this case is free and online!

[Martin Weidmann]

How is this even relevant?

Kleins sent a package and Oswald was photographed with what the package contained. End of story!



JohnM

How is this even relevant?

You just don't want to answer. What else is new?

Kleins sent a package and Oswald was photographed with what the package contained. End of story!

Thank you for admitting that it is nothing more than a story!   

[John Mytton]

Thank you for admitting that it is nothing more than a story!   

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/end%20of%20story

Sorry to keep clobbering you, but you asked for it! 

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/end%20of%20story

Sorry to keep clobbering you, but you asked for it! 

JohnM

Even too dumb to understand sarcasm.

[John Iacoletti]

How bizarre, another odd Iacoletti conclusion, Kirk and McCamy were speaking on behalf of the photographic panel. And let's not forget that we also have McCamy reinforcing the Panel's conclusion. Geez John, whatever it takes! LOL²

“Odd conclusion”. LOL.

“Reinforcing”. LOL.

McCamy never said he considered the rifle uniquely identifiable. There’s a reason for that.

Oh really??

"yes, indeed it is the same rifle."

Yes, really.

"has to tilt the scales in the direction"

Ignoring that part doesn’t make it go away.

And the HSCA Photographic Panel even provided their evidence to support their conclusion and the fanatical CT community has has decades to disprove their findings and so far not a peep, why is that, John?

It’s not necessary to disprove something that hasn’t been proven in the first place. That’s the thing the fanatical LN zealots never seem to understand.

You said they “verified” that it was the same rifle. You’re just wrong.

[John Iacoletti]

How is this even relevant?

Kleins sent a package and Oswald was photographed with what the package contained. End of story!

LOL. Repeating the claim doesn’t make it any more true. Neither does tacking on “end of story”.

[John Mytton]

LOL. Repeating the claim doesn’t make it any more true. Neither does tacking on “end of story”.

LOL

Repeating "LOL" over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again, ad infinitum, doesn't make your weak rebuttals any more true and in fact your obsession of "Laughing Out Loud" at every misperceived injustice, does your CT community no favours. So indeed do keep it up because it makes my job a hellava lot easier.

Btw, incidentally for someone who is constantly Laughing Out Loud, you don't exactly come across as a guy that has a sense of humour, just sayin'.

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Repeating "LOL" over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again, ad infinitum, doesn't make your weak rebuttals any more true and in fact your obsession of "Laughing Out Loud" at every misperceived injustice, does your CT community no favours. So indeed do keep it up because it makes my job a hellava lot easier.

Btw, incidentally for someone who is constantly Laughing Out Loud, you don't exactly come across as a guy that has a sense of humour, just sayin'.

JohnM

it makes my job a hellava lot easier.

You have a job?

As for the LOL replies, they are the best way to deal with all the BS LNs come up with. As our recent encounter clearly shows there's just no way to have a reasonable adult conversation with a fanatic like you. So, John should continue to call you and your ilk out and if he gets under your skin - as he clearly does - all the more power to him.