One of the most important books in this case is free and online!

[John Iacoletti]

The rifle order from Kleins proves that Oswald ordered the murder weapon under an alias which suggests to me he didn't want Lee Harvey Oswald associated with his purchase, I reckon his initial reasoning was to disassociate himself from the Walker attempted assassination.

What you “reckon” isn’t particularly interesting. Or relevant.

Subsequently Oswald was photographed with C2766

LOL.

[John Iacoletti]

You seem to begin "connecting the dots" by making large jumps of faith...

Bingo. The biggest failing among the WC-faithful is equating imagination and faith to “solid evidence”.

[John Iacoletti]

C2766 was sent by Kleins to Oswald's PO box.

There is ZERO evidence of that.

C2766 was photographed with Oswald which was verified by the HSCA photographic panel.

This is false. The panel “verified” no such thing.

C2766 was discovered with Oswald's prints on the 6th floor of Oswald's work.

No, there were some prints near the trigger guard that were unsuitable for identification purposes and a single partial palmprint turned up a week later on an index card.

You obviously don’t know the evidence.

After you have sufficiently proven that you know this evidence then we may proceed but otherwise I'm getting tired of repeating myself, and watching your lacklustre attempts to show conspiracy is just plain boring.
Try harder or perhaps find another hobby.

Maybe you should try something besides parroting the same BS and expecting it to somehow be more convincing.

[John Iacoletti]

C2766 was sent by Kleins to Oswald's PO box.

That doesn’t prove that anything was sent anywhere. Repeating the claim doesn’t make it any more true.

C2766 was photographed with Oswald which was verified by the HSCA photographic panel.

A conclusion isn’t a “verification”. Repeating the claim doesn’t make it any more true.

The FBI's proof that the Lt Day print came from C2766, thus proving Oswald touched the murder weapon

A contrived “Mytton” gif is not “FBI proof”. Nor have you proven what “the murder weapon” was. Repeating the claim doesn’t make it any more true.

[Martin Weidmann]

John,

A couple of pages back I asked a question in response to one of your claims. You might have missed it, so here it is again;

The rifle order from Kleins proves that Oswald ordered the murder weapon under an alias

Really? So, there is no possible way that he just filled out those forms for a guy he knew as A. Hidell? Remember, in a conspiracy scenario Oswald would have to be manipulated and set up, right?

Can you answer the question, please?

[Michael Walton]

John, regarding the HSCA. you're missing the larger point or conclusion of it.

They did conclude there was a "probable conspiracy" in the case. That's what I meant by my previous reply, not the acoustic evidence, which I do think was flawed, too.

Now you're probably going to say, "well, that was neither here nor there." But it's not. It's a conclusion from a so-called blue ribbon panel, just like the WC folks were considered a blue ribbon panel.

In other words, you can't just dismiss one and embrace the other.

[Martin Weidmann]

John, regarding the HSCA. you're missing the larger point or conclusion of it.

They did conclude there was a "probable conspiracy" in the case. That's what I meant by my previous reply, not the acoustic evidence, which I do think was flawed, too.

Now you're probably going to say, "well, that was neither here nor there." But it's not. It's a conclusion from a so-called blue ribbon panel, just like the WC folks were considered a blue ribbon panel.

In other words, you can't just dismiss one and embrace the other.

In other words, you can't just dismiss one and embrace the other.

Of course, he can! He is "John Mytton" and can dismiss evidence just as easily as accept superficial assumptions!