Time for Truth

[John Mytton]

But don't bother because you will never be able to do so and any further posts from you about the subject will be an even bigger waste of time than they usually are.

No worries, I knew you'd run away, cowards always run.

I've proved beyond all doubt with actual evidence that Oswald purchased C2766.
I've proved beyond all doubt with actual evidence that Oswald possessed C2766.
I've proved beyond all doubt with actual evidence that Oswald's rifle with his prints and matching shirt fibers was found on the 6th floor of Oswald's workplace.

Btw reading your pathetic rebuttals while failing miserably and then watching you self destruct because you don't know the evidence is very satisfying.


And please keep looking stupid but this time come up with something new so I can destroy you all over again.

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

No worries, I knew you'd run away, cowards always run.

I've proved beyond all doubt with actual evidence that Oswald purchased C2766.
I've proved beyond all doubt with actual evidence that Oswald possessed C2766.
I've proved beyond all doubt with actual evidence that Oswald's rifle with his prints and matching shirt fibers was found on the 6th floor of Oswald's workplace.

Btw reading your pathetic rebuttals while failing miserably and then watching you self destruct because you don't know the evidence is very satisfying.


And please keep looking stupid but this time come up with something new so I can destroy you all over again.

JohnM

No worries, I knew you'd run away, cowards always run.

Well, you've had enough experiences over the past decade in running away and then project that on others. Nothing new there.

I've proved beyond all doubt with actual evidence that Oswald purchased C2766.
I've proved beyond all doubt with actual evidence that Oswald possessed C2766.
I've proved beyond all doubt with actual evidence that Oswald's rifle with his prints and matching shirt fibers was found on the 6th floor of Oswald's workplace.

Ah the sound of total delusion..... In reality you haven't proven a thing as you are incapable of proving anything.

Btw reading your pathetic rebuttals while failing miserably and then watching you self destruct because you don't know the evidence is very satisfying.

So, not only completely delusional but also delusions of grandeur. Hilarious!

What I said;

any further posts from you about the subject will be an even bigger waste of time than they usually are.

has turned out to be completely accurate....   

And please keep looking stupid but this time come up with something new so I can destroy you all over again.

Why would I have to come up with something new, when you can't even deal with what is being discussed right now.

[John Mytton]

..... In reality you haven't proven a thing as you are incapable of proving anything.

Proven to whom, YOU, the King of Kooks??? Hahahahahahahaha!

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Proven to whom, YOU, the King of Kooks??? Hahahahahahahaha!

JohnM

Insults, ridicule, misrepresentations and delusions of grandeur is all you've got.

What you haven't got is a conclusive narrative or credible evidence to support your pathetically wild claims....

You behave like a 5 year old.

[John Mytton]

Insults, ridicule, misrepresentations and delusions of grandeur is all you've got.

What you haven't got is a conclusive narrative or credible evidence to support your pathetically wild claims....

You behave like a 5 year old.

Geez another meltdown!

What's amusing is that we have proven that you don't even know the basics of this case yet you've appointed yourself as some sort of ultimate arbiter but the painful reality is that, you just keep embarrassing yourself.

And please explain how your "Amazon" analogy is even slightly relevant?

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Geez another meltdown!

What's amusing is that we have proven that you don't even know the basics of this case yet you've appointed yourself as some sort of ultimate arbiter but the painful reality is that, you just keep embarrassing yourself.

And please explain how your "Amazon" analogy is even slightly relevant?

JohnM

Here you go again with that pathetic I/we "have proven" stuff when in reality you clearly don't even know what proof is.

And please explain how your "Amazon" analogy is even slightly relevant?

Because the answer is proof that your "Waldman confirmed that C2766 was sent" is utter BS.

[John Mytton]

And please explain how your "Amazon" analogy is even slightly relevant?

Because the answer is proof that your "Waldman confirmed that C2766 was sent" is utter BS.

You're very confused and are still making zero sense?
Let me get this straight, Amazon processes and records completed paperwork which says that they sent out to an exact address a package which contains a checkable specific serial numbered item by post/courier etc and on a certain date but in reality they don't send out the package?

JohnM