Time for Truth

[Alan J. Ford]

There are a multitude of witnesses who confirm Oswald was elsewhere in the known timeframe that makes your premise impossible. Not a single one of Oswald's coworkers put him there.

These same "multitude of witnesses", Mr. Smith, were given a hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure to parrot back, nothing more, nothing less. The deception surrounding the events at 10th & Patton were nothing more than a crafty invention placing the wrongly-accused nowhere near where he truly was (still in Dealey Plaza post-assassination time @ 1:12PM CST). Please spare those of us reading along here the horse manure about the wrongly-accused even admitting to going to his rooming house (another clever deceptive rendering to place him in proximity of 10th & Patton, while stopping at his rooming house to fetch a fictitious pistol and change his shirt that he is wearing in Mr. Mentesana's film capture post-assassination time while still in Dealey Plaza and yet again at his midnight presser)...Care to explain that away, Mr. Smith?  you want to usher in some "evidence" that suggests after supposedly changing his shirt he went back to the rooming house and switched back into his original-and-only shirt he wore that afternoon (in Dealey Plaza, in front of the shoe store, at the Texas Theatre, and once again at his midnight presser.

There is no audio recording of the wrongly-accused saying anything they said he said. Care to prove that assertion wrong, Mr. Smith? Cannot do it, can you? There's a reason for that. They said he said this or said that because they knew there would be no rebuttal...dead men cannot speak.

Now, to your 2nd comment, quote, Not a single one of Oswald's coworkers put him there, unquote

meaning the post-assassination time of 1:12Pm as depicted in Mr. Mentesana's film. Of course, none of his lying coworkers would dare come off script...

Few men have virtue to withstand the highest bidder. -- George Washington

yet both Mr. Williams (Bonnie) and Mr. Lovelady (Billy Nolan) watched him climb the entrance steps in the Hughes film post-assassination time as the wrongly-accused enters the TSBD building. The issue here for you and every LN is the wrongly-accused remains in the same shirt  from post-assassination time 1:12PM as depicted by Mr. Mentesana's film right through to his midnight presser, further buttressed by the separate descriptions along the same timeline sequence given by employees at the shoe store and movie theatre respectively. Both of them describe the wrongly-accused's attire as depicted in Mr. Mentesana's film right down to even agreeing with the manner of dress...different time sequences but the same outcome @ wearing the same attire.

Your "multitude of witnesses", Mr. Smith, are simply parrots parroting back a hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure to align with what those framing an innocent party  said he said he did (please excuse the eyeroll). Now, a simple question, unless of course you care to cower away from it again, How do you explain away how the wrongly-accused is depicted in five different sequences post-assassination time wearing the same attire he is factually in, yet support a hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure?


The wrongly-accused did not shoot anybody. Anybody.

[Alan J. Ford]

LNs are stumped...

they cannot explain away why the wrongly accused remained in Dealey Plaza post-assassination time, well after the hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure said he was elsewhere.

Mr. Brewer: He had a brown sports shirt on. His shirt tail was out.
Mr. BELIN. Any jacket?
Mr. BREWEB No.
Mr. BELIN. Any other clothing that you noticed?
Mr. BREWER. He had a T-shirt underneath his shirt.
Mr. BELIN. Was his shirt buttoned up all the way?
Mr. BREWER. A couple of buttons were unbuttoned at the time.

Sound familiar folks?

Only one single individual in Dealey Plaza that afternoon wore this particular brown shirt and in the manner described by multiple witnesses and/or filmed post-assassination time (see the embedded video below and freeze the frame at the times noted) Same shirt, same untucked dress manner.

Texas Theatre employee Julia Postal described the same attire worn in the same fashion. Both her and Mr. Brewer's observations are further confirmed when the wrongly-accused is escorted from the Texas Theatre donning the same clothing as depicted by both these post-assassination witnesses. It's of particular interests that in both the Texas Theatre images and the film taken by Mr. Hughes post-assassination time in Dealey Plaza we actually get to also see the same grey coloured pants worn with the brown shirt in Dealey Plaza and upon the wrongly-accused being escorted from the movie theatre.

To further buttress both Mr. Mentesana's post-assassination film and Mr. Hughes' post-assassination film footage as well, we all are privy to the the wrongly-accused's clothing attire and the manner he wore it (see Mr. Brewer's testimony above), because he wore the same clothing in the same manner at his midnight presser.

Mr. Hughes (Robert) freeze at 8:03 -- 8:04 as the wrongly-accused reenters the TSBD post-assassination time; and Mr. Mentesana's post-assassination time capture of the wrongly-accused still in Dealey Plaza post-assassination time freeze at 8:44 -- 8:52...

Same brown shirt, worn in the same manner in all sequence instances in Dealey Plaza post-assassination time; and described in detail by both Mr. Brewer (Johnny) and Ms. Postal (Julia) as well. The slam-dunk is the midnight presser (same shirt, same manner of dress).

The nefarious invention about the wrongly-accused going to his rooming house was just that a deceptive invention to place him where it served the interests of those framing him, nothing more, nothing less. He said this, he said that (Riiiiight) Amazing what some people will do for thirty pieces of silver (bunch of lying treasonous cowards).

The wrongly-accused did not shoot anybody. Anybody. It's time for truth.

[Zeon Mason]

Apology to Alan Ford for diversionary discussion with Mr Buglio Mytton whom I no doubt will never be swayed there was a conspiracy of ANY sort.

That’s his perception of the “truth” and I can see why he  made his conclusion IF he believes the evidence is essentially sound and that anomalous details have plausible explanations

For myself,however, the magnitude of so many anomalies seems to defy mere incompetent handling of evidence, and or confusion of overlapping agencies of FBI CIA, SS, DPD conducting their parallel investigations, as a suitable explanation.

The PM theory was one of  the best alternative CT theories , It seemed to me and many other CTs , because the figure resembles Oswald and the location in that corner a logical place that an aloof character as Oswald, would go if he arrived late to the steps at 12:29, having been prompted from having seen Norman and Jarman renter TSBD from rear door whilst Oswald was eating his lunch on the Domino room at 12:25.

However since no one on this forum has substantially proved the newest version of Darnell image of PM is some  kind of fake image or that the effect of the white ring around the neck of PM is some anomaly caused by translation of the original Darnell to computer pixel format, then reluctantly, Oswald =PM is rendered doubtful.

Grant me my suspicions of doctored imaging of the Darnell film , due to what other images  Mr. Ford has already shown in the lengthy PM discussion thread such as the dark shadow anomaly in Weigman film and the Cronkite version of the Altgens no.6 photo. Image alteration which suggests some government coverup efforts to negate the Hosty interview notes of Oswald began  at the very start of Will Fritz investigation in 1963.

[John Iacoletti]

white ring around the neck of PM

[Alan J. Ford]

Apology to Alan Ford for diversionary discussion with Mr Buglio Mytton whom I no doubt will never be swayed there was a conspiracy of ANY sort.

That’s his perception of the “truth” ...

Image alteration which suggests some government coverup efforts to negate the Hosty interview notes of Oswald began  at the very start of Will Fritz investigation in 1963.

Well said, Mr. Mason, especially your assessment of Captain Fritz's hatchet job @ Mr. Hosty's notes. No great surprise since the coverup of the plain simple truth (the wrongly-accused did not shoot anybody) had to be ignored amid a hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure. Lest the research community forgets it was Captain Fritz who invented the whole he said this and said that about returning to his rooming house. Quite a clever invention albeit nefarious in nature to put the wrongly-accused near the event that unfolded across town at 10th & Patton. The problem with Fritz's notes are twofold: (A) The photo images of both Mr. Mentesana (Ernest) and Mr. Hughes (Robert) capturing the wrongly-accused still in Dealey Plaza post-assassination time after the big red Fire Station 3 fire-truck arrives in Dealey Plaza (1:12PM) and (B) no great surprise that Fritz like so many others involved in the coverup succumbed to the following quote...

Few men have virtue to withstand the highest bidder. -- George Washington

Just a quick question before I gather my notes to make a brief post: Do you have any thoughts on the "white ring around the neck" photo shared by Mr. Iacoletti?

[Alan J. Ford]

There's plenty of evidence that the wrongly-accused spent ample time with Warren C. de Brueys down in New Orleans during the Summer of 1963. Back next week to make a follow-up on comparing the well-heeled suited gentleman in the Mentesana film standing roughly 25' away from the wrongly-accused in Dealey Plaza post-assassination time (1:12PM) ... no need to click upon the video just note the balding suited figure standing there in close proximity to the wrongly-accused in his familiar attire...

and compare with the the following video filmed down in New Orleans during the Summer of 1963 (freeze the frame at 9 secs in for better clarity) and note the blading suited gentleman just in front of the suited gentleman with one arm raised just behind him...

A striking resemblance for sure. Could the balding gentlemen in both venues standing in close proximity of the wrongly-accused each time of the year (Summer & late Fall) be none other than Bureau agent Warren C. de Brueys?

Will take a much closer look and return back here next week the Good Lord willing to follow-up. Meanwhile, safe travels, best of health & happiness to all. Somebody was responsible for handling the movements of the wrongly-accused. Perhaps the same person also transported him out of Dealey Plaza post-assassination time (1:12PM).

[Alan Ford]

Mr. Hughes (Robert) freeze at 8:03 -- 8:04 as the wrongly-accused reenters the TSBD post-assassination time;

Mr. Ford, this man being escorted inside the building by an officer is NOT Mr. Oswald but a black man