Who Killed J.D. Tippit?

[Martin Weidmann]

Weidmann's only reason for his insane allegations comes from this 1 man who tried to remember a single fact from decades previous. Unbelievable that we even give Weidmann the time of day but watching the crazy ramblings of his extreme paranoia is kinda funny.

JohnM

Anything's better that just debating the actual evidence, right Johnny?

Keep running....

[John Mytton]

Anything's better that just debating the actual evidence, right Johnny?

Keep running....

I only debate the evidence and quote actual testimony and supply Commission Exhibits to support my arguments whereas you makeup stuff like substituting the word "information" instead of "identification" in the weak hope no one notices but luckily Mitch knows the evidence a bit better than you.
 
And your (easily fact checked) story about Bentley taking Oswald's wallet to the Hospital was extra Kooky.

And saying to Richard that the wallet in the TV footage wasn't even opened "In the footage you see the wallet being held but not opened", yet another Marty clanger.

C'mon Weidmann just admit that your reality is in trying to discredit the CT's because you are doing nothing to further the Conspiracy cause and this last Whopper of a theory about substituting wallets/identification is especially embarrassing because as has been pointed out on numerous occasions, why coverup the most damning piece of evidence in the Tippit murder? and don't repeat your indefensible BS when we all know the Dallas Police were in control of all the evidence.

And ALL this is just in the short time I've been back posting. WOW!

Btw thanks for calling me Johnny, that was my nickname when I was a young'un and it brings back some neato memories.

JohnM

[Bill Brown]

I only debate the evidence and quote actual testimony and supply Commission Exhibits to support my arguments whereas you makeup stuff like substituting the word "information" instead of "identification" in the weak hope no one notices but luckily Mitch knows the evidence a bit better than you.
 
And your (easily fact checked) story about Bentley taking Oswald's wallet to the Hospital was extra Kooky.

And saying to Richard that the wallet in the TV footage wasn't even opened "In the footage you see the wallet being held but not opened", yet another Marty clanger.

C'mon Weidmann just admit that your reality is in trying to discredit the CT's because you are doing nothing to further the Conspiracy cause and this last Whopper of a theory about substituting wallets/identification is especially embarrassing because as has been pointed out on numerous occasions, why coverup the most damning piece of evidence in the Tippit murder? and don't repeat your indefensible BS when we all know the Dallas Police were in control of all the evidence.

And ALL this is just in the short time I've been back posting. WOW!

JohnM

You left off Weidmann's claim that no physical description of the Tippit killer was broadcast on the police radio.  All of us are wrong from time to time, no biggie.  But THAT is Tippit 101.

[John Mytton]

You left off Weidmann's claim that no physical description of the Tippit killer was broadcast on the police radio.  All of us are wrong from time to time, no biggie.  But THAT is Tippit 101.

 

Thanks Bill, I missed that one. 

Btw I'm enjoying the Jacket debate over at the Ed Forum and even though Greg Doudna has a lot of ideas I don't agree with, he conducts himself like a gentleman and the fact that he fights for Ruth Paine in that World of slander and lies is encouraging. 

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

I only debate the evidence and quote actual testimony and supply Commission Exhibits to support my arguments whereas you makeup stuff like substituting the word "information" instead of "identification" in the weak hope no one notices but luckily Mitch knows the evidence a bit better than you.
 
And your (easily fact checked) story about Bentley taking Oswald's wallet to the Hospital was extra Kooky.

And saying to Richard that the wallet in the TV footage wasn't even opened "In the footage you see the wallet being held but not opened", yet another Marty clanger.

C'mon Weidmann just admit that your reality is in trying to discredit the CT's because you are doing nothing to further the Conspiracy cause and this last Whopper of a theory about substituting wallets/identification is especially embarrassing because as has been pointed out on numerous occasions, why coverup the most damning piece of evidence in the Tippit murder? and don't repeat your indefensible BS when we all know the Dallas Police were in control of all the evidence.

And ALL this is just in the short time I've been back posting. WOW!

Btw thanks for calling me Johnny, that was my nickname when I was a young'un and it brings back some neato memories.

JohnM

Thanks Bill, I missed that one. 

Btw I'm enjoying the Jacket debate over at the Ed Forum and even though Greg Doudna has a lot of ideas I don't agree with, he conducts himself like a gentleman and the fact that he fights for Ruth Paine in that World of slander and lies is encouraging. 

JohnM

When LNs resort to attacking somebody who disagrees with them, it only means they have no evidence to support their claims.

I only debate the evidence and quote actual testimony and supply Commission Exhibits to support my arguments

Really? Prove it by showing me where it says that "Oswald begrudgingly admitted to several law enforcement officers that he was carrying the Hidell ID" instead of giving me the usual "It's not my problem that you don't know the evidence" crap you are known for?

Also, I asked a little while back;

Show me the actual evidence (so not opinions or assumptions) that the fake Hidell ID was in the wallet that Bentley took from Oswald in the car on the way to the police station, and I'll shut up about the Tippit scene wallet and how they were possibly switched.

So far, all you've been doing is whining about nasty CTs to divert the attention away from this question as you clearly don't have an answer.

Btw thanks for calling me Johnny, that was my nickname when I was a young'un and it brings back some neato memories.

So, when you were young you were already using the Mytton alias? 

[John Mytton]

When LNs resort to attacking somebody who disagrees with them, it only means they have no evidence to support their claims.

Stop being so paranoid, nobody's attacking you, all we are doing is highlighting your plethora of easily fact checked mistakes, if you didn't type lies, then you'd have nothing to worry about.

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Weidmann's only reason for his insane allegations comes from this 1 man who tried to remember a single fact from decades previous. Unbelievable that we even give Weidmann the time of day but watching the crazy ramblings of his extreme paranoia is kinda funny.

JohnM

Weidmann's only reason for his insane allegations comes from this 1 man who tried to remember a single fact from decades previous.

Not really. Ron Reiland, who filmed the wallet being held at the Tippit scene, said on day one, on television, that it was a wallet which he (incorrectly) believed belonged to Tippit.

As far as Barrett, who has always believed Oswald was guilty, is concerned. Bill Brown pointed out recently that he had seen newspaper interviews with Barrett in the 80's well before Barret discussed the matter with Hosty. That would fit perfectly, because until the HSCA hearings most evidence was still secret and locked away at the National Archives. That means that between 1963 and the late 70's Barrett would have had no reason to believe there was something strange going on with the wallet(s).

The same applies to General Walker who saw a photograph of the bullet allegedly taken from his house during a HSCA hearing and he instantly knew it was a substitute, so he started writing to the HSCA who ignored him. It also wasn't until the HSCA hearings that other questionable things started coming out.

In Barrett's case, until the late 70's, he may well have believed that when they referred to Oswald's wallet, it was the one he saw at the Tippit scene. And when he found out that it wasn't, he became convinced the DPD had manipulated the wallet evidence one way or another. His obvious problem was of course that in the 80's he was still an active FBI agent and going public with this information might well have cost him his career. After his retirement he was free to talk and he did, maintaining his story for the rest of his life despite all the vile attacks by LNs.