Box Dimensions?

[Charles Collins]

So far, after considerable study and a lot of helpful advice (thanks), I have come up with some revised dimensions. These estimates are just that (estimates) because it would take someone actually measuring the boxes at the national archives to obtain accurate measurements. So, here are the estimates:

Box “A” - (CE 641 and CE 1306): 13”w x 9”d x 8.5”h

Box “B” - (CE 653 and CE 1308): 13”w x 9”d x 8.5”h

Box “C” - (CE 654 and CE 1309): 17”w x 11.5”d x 14”h

Box “D” - (CE 648 and CE 1307): 17.5”w x 11.75”d x 13”h

I have revised the first post in this thread to reflect the changes…

[Charles Collins]

The Trolls have just polluted yet another well-meaning and on-track research thread.

It seems that those folks would rather argue the SOS over and over again than learn anything.

[John Iacoletti]

And Oswald moved some of the boxes as confirmed by his prints.  Guilty!

Yeah, because in WC-apologist wonderland, touching boxes is evidence of murder.

[John Iacoletti]

His prints are also on a long bag next to the window.

LOL.

[Richard Smith]

Poor Oswald.  So unlucky again.  In his role as an "order filler", he somehow managed to be the ONLY TSBD employee to leave his prints on the very boxes found in SN.   And these are unopened boxes.  So his bad luck continued.  He apparently was the ONLY TSBD employee who had to move these very boxes to get to his stock! HA HA HA.  The contrarians can't even believe this defense attorney nonsense. 

[Richard Smith]

So--------------the very, very best this can ever give you still won't be enough to put Mr. Oswald at the SN window at 12:30pm

 

Other than a time machine it is difficult to understand how there could be any more evidence of the fact.  What do you believe is lacking?  The shots were fired from the 6th floor window at 12:30.  Fired bullet casings from a rifle belonging to Oswald were found by that window.  Oswald's prints are on the SN boxes.  His prints are on a long bag found near that window.  His rifle is left on that floor.  He has no credible alibi, flees the building within minutes, kills a police officer and lies to the police about the rifle and many other things.  It is a drumbeat of guilt.  Criminals take measures to avoid detection while committing the act.  Not every crime is captured on film.  That does not create any doubt, however, when a mountain of evidence is left at the scene.  Guilty.

[Alan Ford]

Other than a time machine it is difficult to understand how there could be any more evidence of the fact.  What do you believe is lacking?  The shots were fired from the 6th floor window at 12:30.  Fired bullet casings from a rifle belonging to Oswald were found by that window.  Oswald's prints are on the SN boxes.  His prints are on a long bag found near that window.  His rifle is left on that floor.

You can keep on reproducing this McAdams boilerplate till you're blue in the face, Mr. Smith, it still won't get you anywhere.

Let me repeat:

Even if we were to be foolish enough to accept all your claims here, you would still only have an evidentiary pattern that is ambiguous-----------it could point to Mr. Oswald as (suicidally stupid) lone gunman; Mr. Oswald as (suicidally trusting) gunman in a conspiracy; Mr. Oswald as (suicidally trusting) non-gunman but accomplice; Mr. Oswald as innocent patsy.

But I do sympathize with you in your frustration, Mr. Smith, I really do.

Concerned regards..........