Hunter Biden laptop

[Richard Smith]

Why don't you just wait and see what is actually on the laptop. There has been all sorts of speculation but so far the investigation of the FBI (which has been going for a while now) seems to have yielded very little.

How many more years should we wait?  The FBI has already had it for three years.   The fact that they haven't done anything is a function of political bias.  Hunter wrote a book admitting to numerous drug and sex trafficking felonies.  But at least we can put to rest the bizarre conspiracy narrative that the Russians were behind this.  Another example of CTers claiming the evidence was manufactured to frame someone but then also claiming the evidence doesn't implicate them in a crime.  Very amusing logical inconsistency.

[Jon Banks]

How many more years should we wait?  The FBI has already had it for three years.   The fact that they haven't done anything is a function of political bias.  Hunter wrote a book admitting to numerous drug and sex trafficking felonies.  But at least we can put to rest the bizarre conspiracy narrative that the Russians were behind this.  Another example of CTers claiming the evidence was manufactured to frame someone but then also claiming the evidence doesn't implicate them in a crime.  Very amusing logical inconsistency.

Four years now. They got the laptop in 2019.

Very unlikely that the FBI or Homeland Security wouldn't confirm that Russia was involved with violating the privacy of the President's son.

[Martin Weidmann]

How many more years should we wait?  The FBI has already had it for three years.   The fact that they haven't done anything is a function of political bias.  Hunter wrote a book admitting to numerous drug and sex trafficking felonies.  But at least we can put to rest the bizarre conspiracy narrative that the Russians were behind this.  Another example of CTers claiming the evidence was manufactured to frame someone but then also claiming the evidence doesn't implicate them in a crime.  Very amusing logical inconsistency.

How many more years should we wait? 

As long as it takes. Or would you prefer they jump to conclusions, as you normally do?

The FBI has already had it for three years.   The fact that they haven't done anything is a function of political bias.

Who says they haven't done anything? They may well have investigated it and found there simply is no there there. Not that you would ever accept that.

Hunter wrote a book admitting to numerous drug and sex trafficking felonies.

Have you read the book? I seriously doubt it....

Another example of CTers claiming the evidence was manufactured to frame someone but then also claiming the evidence doesn't implicate them in a crime.

Who exactly made those claims?

[Richard Smith]

How many more years should we wait?  The FBI has already had it for three years.   The fact that they haven't done anything is a function of political bias.

Who says they haven't done anything? They may well have investigated it and found there simply is no there there. Not that you would ever accept that.

Yes, I'm sure that is the case.  And then they kept it to themselves.  LOL.  That contradicts reports from numerous media outlets including leftist propaganda arms such as CNN and CBS:


"The FBI months ago gathered what agents believed was sufficient evidence to charge Hunter Biden, the president's son, with crimes related to taxes and making a false statement when purchasing a gun, according to sources familiar with the investigation.

Evidence gathered by FBI and IRS investigators was sent to the U.S. Attorney's office in Delaware, according to the sources."

[Martin Weidmann]

Yes, I'm sure that is the case.  And then they kept it to themselves.  LOL.  That contradicts reports from numerous media outlets including leftist propaganda arms such as CNN and CBS:

"The FBI months ago gathered what agents believed was sufficient evidence to charge Hunter Biden, the president's son, with crimes related to taxes and making a false statement when purchasing a gun, according to sources familiar with the investigation.

Evidence gathered by FBI and IRS investigators was sent to the U.S. Attorney's office in Delaware, according to the sources."

According to sources?

And then they kept it to themselves.

Do you advocate that the FBI holds a press conference about the outcome of every investigation?

"The FBI months ago gathered what agents believed was sufficient evidence to charge Hunter Biden, the president's son, with crimes related to taxes and making a false statement when purchasing a gun

So, possible tax evasion and a false statement to buy a gun? That's it? No influence peddling, no 10% for the "big guy"? Wow....  Call the media   

[Richard Smith]

According to sources?

And then they kept it to themselves.

Do you advocate that the FBI holds a press conference about the outcome of every investigation?

"The FBI months ago gathered what agents believed was sufficient evidence to charge Hunter Biden, the president's son, with crimes related to taxes and making a false statement when purchasing a gun

So, possible tax evasion and a false statement to buy a gun? That's it? No influence peddling, no 10% for the "big guy"? Wow....  Call the media   

Yes, why should the FBI clear up whether the President of the United States and his son were receiving millions from foreign governments?   HA HA HA.  They should just leave it a mystery.  The public has no right to know that.  The FBI certainly had no problem holding a press conference relating to the outcome of the Hillary Clinton investigation.  If Hunter violated no laws, then let the FBI clear his name. 

[Martin Weidmann]

Yes, why should the FBI clear up whether the President of the United States and his son were receiving millions from foreign governments?   HA HA HA.  They should just leave it a mystery.  The public has no right to know that.  The FBI certainly had no problem holding a press conference relating to the outcome of the Hillary Clinton investigation.  If Hunter violated no laws, then let the FBI clear his name.

Yes, why should the FBI clear up whether the President of the United States and his son were receiving millions from foreign governments?

Where does it say that Joe Biden received millions from foreign governments?

Hunter Biden was and still is a private individual. He can make as much money as he can. Just like the Trump kids, but I never hear you complain about them not being investigated.

They should just leave it a mystery.

What mystery would that be? Where there is no smoke, there is also no fire. When the FBI doesn't turnover a case to the DOJ for prosecution, they simply do not have a case. No mystery at all.

The FBI certainly had no problem holding a press conference relating to the outcome of the Hillary Clinton investigation.

Yes, that was a pretty dumb thing to do. Not that it made any difference for fools like you who still claim she was guilty (of something....   )

If Hunter violated no laws, then let the FBI clear his name.

They may well have already done so, except perhaps for some tax evasion and a lie on a gun application (according to sources, right?)

But, just like with Clinton, it doesn't matter for you in any case. You'll just continue to make all sorts of allegations.