Hunter Biden laptop

[Richard Smith]

Will Old Joe pardon Hunter when he goes to the slammer?  My guess is that the corrupt DOJ cuts a deal to give Hunter a slap on the wrist after the election to avoid the hearings that will come when the Repubs take over.   Uncle James is also part of Biden, Inc.  They can be bunk mates in the big house.  Avenatti can give them legal advice from the next cell.

[Richard Smith]

Hunter must pinch himself every morning when he wakes up in a Malibu home being paid for by some unknown person.  Nothing to see there.  Just another day in paradise (i.e. Biden, Inc.). 

[Richard Smith]

If Hunter still had his laptop, he could do a Google search to see when he is going to jail.

[Richard Smith]

They are preparing a room for Hunter in the big house.  Will the FBI stage a predawn air, sea, and ground assault on his Malibu home to take him into custody like they have done to nonviolent elderly people like Roger Stone?  LOL.

[Richard Smith]

This was once deemed "disinformation" and the product of Russian interference.  Any mention was subject to a ban on social media highlighting the incredible bias and attempts by social media to influence the 2020 election.  Chris Wallace actually shutdown President Trump when he tried to raise this issue during the debate.   Ironically, the leftist media did exactly what they were suggesting the Russians were doing during the election. 

Better later than never, though:  "CBS joins New York Times, Washington Post, NBC, CNN in verifying laptop after media dismissed New York Post's reporting."

[Joe Elliott]

This was once deemed "disinformation" and the product of Russian interference.  Any mention was subject to a ban on social media highlighting the incredible bias and attempts by social media to influence the 2020 election.  Chris Wallace actually shutdown President Trump when he tried to raise this issue during the debate.   Ironically, the leftist media did exactly what they were suggesting the Russians were doing during the election. 

Better later than never, though:  "CBS joins New York Times, Washington Post, NBC, CNN in verifying laptop after media dismissed New York Post's reporting."

How could the media, or anyone, "verify" the laptop.

Did the laptop go directly from Hunter Biden to a reputable agency like the Washington Post or the FBI? No. It went from Hunter Biden, to someone hostile to him, a laptop repairman, before it, or a copy of the data went on to the Washington post.

Did the people hostile to Hunter Biden have access to experts who could fake data very well? Yes, by simply taking the laptop to any Russian embassy and asking them to examine it. Such a notion would be obvious, because Trump, in a 2016 Presidential debate, called upon the Russians to find/manufacture email evidence against Hillary Clinton.

Quote from Wikipedia on the Hunter Biden laptop controversy:

On October 19, 2020, a group of 51 former senior intelligence officials, who had served in the Trump administration and those of the three previous presidents, released an open letter stating that the release of the alleged emails "has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation," adding:

We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails, provided to the New York Post by President Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement – just that our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in this case.

This is a classic case of a piece of 'evidence' having major "Chain of Custody" issues. The CTers cite this a lot. But never with an example of a piece of evidence passing through the hands of a non police or FBI official, with a clear motive to fake the evidence. Merely the suggestion that such and such an officer may have been motivated against Oswald. Never a clear case like that of the laptop repairman being hostile to the Biden's.

[Richard Smith]

How could the media, or anyone, "verify" the laptop.

Did the laptop go directly from Hunter Biden to a reputable agency like the Washington Post or the FBI? No. It went from Hunter Biden, to someone hostile to him, a laptop repairman, before it, or a copy of the data went on to the Washington post.

Did the people hostile to Hunter Biden have access to experts who could fake data very well? Yes, by simply taking the laptop to any Russian embassy and asking them to examine it. Such a notion would be obvious, because Trump, in a 2016 Presidential debate, called upon the Russians to find/manufacture email evidence against Hillary Clinton.

Quote from Wikipedia on the Hunter Biden laptop controversy:

On October 19, 2020, a group of 51 former senior intelligence officials, who had served in the Trump administration and those of the three previous presidents, released an open letter stating that the release of the alleged emails "has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation," adding:

This is a classic case of a piece of 'evidence' having major "Chain of Custody" issues. The CTers cite this a lot. But never with an example of a piece of evidence passing through the hands of a non police or FBI official, with a clear motive to fake the evidence. Merely the suggestion that such and such an officer may have been motivated against Oswald. Never a clear case like that of the laptop repairman being hostile to the Biden's.

They somehow "verified" it was disinformation before the election.   Anyone who suggested otherwise was banned from social media as a conspiracy theorist.  It's a very simple matter to verify it.  The FBI has had it for a couple of years.  You don't think they have that capability?  You don't think Hunter knows?  It's his laptop.  Maybe ask him under oath at the risk of perjury.  You believe the leftist media is framing Biden suddenly?  The "intelligence" officers were all political hacks that had no more information about the laptop than the average person.  It was an attempt to cover up the damage to get Trump out of office at all costs.  It's what the radicals call "collusion" and an "insurrection" to undermine democracy.  You should be outraged regardless of political bias.