Officer “K”

[Jerry Freeman]

 Walt Cakebread on August 19, 2022, 11:07:57 AM 

   "IT ISN"T EASY TO HANDLE A MOTORCYCLE AND HANG ON TO A JACKET. "

That would explain why he never picked it up and pointed it out to Westbrook instead.

Actually..it doesn't either.
 He wasn't in a hot air balloon. A cop sees something...he obtains it rather than point at it say  "look what I see."
Stepping off a motorcycle is what motorcycle cops do.

[Jerry Freeman]

How are the streets "random" if Oswald had gone to school there and he was in the habit of getting off buses and cabs blocks from his ratty boarding house?

I thought he went to Ft Worth schools.

[Tim Nickerson]

So their statements directly contradict each other.  Any particular reason you're choosing to state Westbrook's account as a fact?  Especially considering that Westbrook couldn't even identify this officer (or even that it was an officer), or under which car the jacket was found.

A statement made under oath by Westbrook a few months after the fact vs a statement made by an unnamed individual to another unnamed individual at an unspecified time.

[Martin Weidmann]

A statement made under oath by Westbrook a few months after the fact vs a statement made by an unnamed individual to another unnamed individual at an unspecified time.

This is hilarious. A person who actually finds a piece of evidence is automatically part of the chain of custody, as he is the only one who can confirm that the piece of evidence was indeed found at that particular location. To argue otherwise is silly.

[John Iacoletti]

A statement made under oath by Westbrook a few months after the fact vs a statement made by an unnamed individual to another unnamed individual at an unspecified time.

You say “under oath” like that makes something more likely to be true.

[Michael Walton]

If you want to talk about the jacket some more, here's some additional and a lot of info about it.

https://reopenkennedycase.forumotion.net/t1165-oswald-and-the-amazing-technicolor-dream-coat

[Bill Chapman]

This is hilarious. A person who actually finds a piece of evidence is automatically part of the chain of custody, as he is the only one who can confirm that the piece of evidence was indeed found at that particular location. To argue otherwise is silly.

Shabby street; shabby Oswald fits right in...