Umbrella Man: Suspicious

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Umbrella Man: Suspicious  (Read 99355 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #196 on: August 18, 2022, 04:29:45 PM »
Why?..if the Baker testimony was all that pat? Why was it necessary to compose this hand written statement on the fly? For what purpose? Well someone didn't. Why was it written then? Well Hell yes. Why would someone who just fired a rifle at the parade and then do all this other stuff attributed to his actions ..wiping off that rifle...hiding it between mountains of boxes of books.. choose to do something so casual as run down to the lunchroom and purchase a soda [which took that extra time needed for an alibi]
The Warrenites couldn't have that anomaly around.

Why would someone who just fired a rifle at the parade and then do all this other stuff attributed to his actions ..wiping off that rifle...hiding it between mountains of boxes of books.. choose to do something so casual as run down to the lunchroom and purchase a soda [which took that extra time needed for an alibi]

You raise a very good point , Mr. Freeman.....  If Lee had just shot the president ....The logical action for him to do after hiding the rifle would have been to simply slip down to the fifth floor and act like he had been watching the parade like the three stooges were, or walk around with his clipboard and act like he was looking for books to fill an order.

Because as Several of the cops stated....  When they arrive at a crime scene they look for a person who is leaving the area while all of the likee-Lew's are gawking and trying to figure out what has happened.  If Lee had ran down those stairs and someone had seen him ....He would have attracted attention and would have became a suspect immediately, whereas if he had been doing normal routine....... 

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #197 on: August 18, 2022, 07:07:13 PM »
How would I or anyone else know almost 60 years later? I suggested it was for the WC finding that Oswald was alone in the second-floor lunchroom during the encounter. Someone on the WC staff was being conscientious and wanted things double-checked.

Burnett might have read or heard an over-generalization about the Coke (the bottle was seen in the assassin's hand, but by Mrs. Reid, not Baker) in the media. He wouldn't have written it at all if he was following some "cover-up playbook" nor would he have submitted such an "incriminating" (LOL) document.

Mark Lane, in reading media reports, at first thought any shots fired from in front came from the Triple Underpass. It was only later he switched to the Grassy Knoll.

Oh my. Such a drama queen. :D

So you don't know if it the Coke issue was an matter of debate by Loons in September 1964.

Burnett might have read or heard an over-generalization about the Coke (the bottle was seen in the assassin's hand, but by Mrs. Reid, not Baker) in the media.

If your account was factual, Mr Organ....Then why would Curry tell reporters that Oswald was such an inhuman fiend that just seconds after he shot the president he was encountered in the building by one of his officers, and he was calmly drinking a Coca Cola.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #198 on: August 18, 2022, 11:55:31 PM »
> Self righteous is what the Bible reference is all about

You accused me of plagiarism.  Besides, you've been caught out representing the words of both Bill Brown and Vince Bugliosi as your own.  What does your holy book say about liars and hypocrites?

Quote
> 'Nobody ever responds to'
    18,000 views and counting

And not a single response.  That's gotta sting.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #199 on: August 18, 2022, 11:57:43 PM »
What I think happened was that one of the FBI men filled out the statement and went to Baker, maybe when Baker was on duty and pressed for time, and got him to review it before signing.

What's an "FBI man" doing writing a statement on behalf of a witness in the first place?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #200 on: August 18, 2022, 11:59:40 PM »
The case states itself:

LOL.

Quote
You taking a knee at Oswald's grave.... that's it, thats the punch line

And you are still unable to articulate what the problem with this is.

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #201 on: August 19, 2022, 03:16:56 AM »
Another point about Umbrella Man and his dark complected buddy--
This clip just reminded me......





People are ducking around, hitting the ground, or otherwise affected by shots in their vicinity but those guys just calmly had a seat on the curbside and seemed quite cool, calm and collected in the midst of chaos....Why?
« Last Edit: August 19, 2022, 03:22:40 AM by Jerry Freeman »

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Umbrella Man: Suspicious
« Reply #202 on: August 26, 2022, 12:09:48 AM »

Oh my. Such a drama queen. :D
So you don't know if it the Coke issue was an matter of debate by Loons in September 1964.
 
Quote
if it the Coke
?
Quote
debate by Loons
LN stands for lone nut?
Take the L and the N and stuff 2 Os between them and what do you have?
Quote
drama queen
Nothing dramatic...just facts.