Umbrella Man: Suspicious

[John Iacoletti]

Hahahaha
Since when would you ever come up with a term like 'dine on the self-righteous indignation' on your own?

Since when have you ever been right about anything?  Besides, there's nothing even remotely similar to that in the bible verses you cited.  Nice try though.  It's hilarious watching you try to be relevant, when you're not obsessively making and posting "clever" graphics that nobody ever responds to and derailing threads with your constant trolling.

[Jerry Freeman]

 The contradiction you always conveniently ignore----

So? Baker corrects a page so it matches his testimony months before. 

So? ?
So that "correction" probably indicates a cover up in order to match anything that shows that Oswald apparently did not haul ass down the staircase as theorized to indicate a lone assassin. SO...Baker was told to scratch it out. That written statement... also probably.. was entered into the records by accident.
And you just admitted it
Oswald was casually gulping a soda [doesn't matter Coke or Dr P] when he was confronted by Baker [wherever that was]

[Bill Chapman]

Since when have you ever been right about anything?  Besides, there's nothing even remotely similar to that in the bible verses you cited.  Nice try though.  It's hilarious watching you try to be relevant, when you're not obsessively making and posting "clever" graphics that nobody ever responds to and derailing threads with your constant trolling.

> Self righteous is what the Bible reference is all about
> I'm right about you being the biggest Oswald Arse Kisser ever
> Show us were my support of the WC is 'trolling'
> 'Nobody ever responds to'
    18,000 views and counting

All creative people are obsessive

[Bill Chapman]

You never stated a case.

The case states itself: You taking a knee at Oswald's grave.... that's it, thats the punch line

[Jerry Freeman]

What I think happened was that one of the FBI men filled out the statement and went to Baker, maybe when Baker was on duty and pressed for time, and got him to review it before signing. The agent was going by some speculative news report (not a "cover-up playbook") that Oswald had the Coke in hand. Roy Truly had a similar handwritten statement that he signed;

You are saying that Burnett wrote by hand.. that Baker affidavit? There are some similarities but look at the 'S' in the text like September and Special and the 'S' in the Burnett signature 'Special Agent' ..totally different.
 But what does that matter? It would be so unusual for FBI to handwrite statements for case witnesses ...they are always typed on official stationary for the record.
That Truly written statement can be found here---
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,3121.msg117213.html#msg117213

[Jerry Freeman]

These statements might have been written in the field and were needed on a "rush" basis.

Why?..if the Baker testimony was all that pat? Why was it necessary to compose this hand written statement on the fly? For what purpose?

When Baker signed it, he didn't agree with "drinking a coke".

Well someone didn't. Why was it written then?

Was the Coke issue even a thing in September 1964?

Well Hell yes. Why would someone who just fired a rifle at the parade and then do all this other stuff attributed to his actions ..wiping off that rifle...hiding it between mountains of boxes of books.. choose to do something so casual as run down to the lunchroom and purchase a soda [which took that extra time needed for an alibi]
The Warrenites couldn't have that anomaly around.

[Jerry Freeman]

  Someone on the WC staff was being conscientious and wanted things double-checked. Burnett might have read or heard an over-generalization about the Coke

Mark Lane, in reading media reports, at first thought any shots fired from in front came from the Triple Underpass. It was only later he switched to the Grassy Knoll.

What does that have to do with anything? Some 50+ spectators reported shot or shots fired from that area.
You can have the last word...you always seem to want it.