The Position of the Bolt on the MC

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The Position of the Bolt on the MC  (Read 158480 times)

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: The Position of the Bolt on the MC
« Reply #287 on: August 27, 2022, 07:46:05 PM »
The weight you've posted is for a Carcano without a scope....  I believe that CE 139 weighed nearly 9 pounds.

The reason that the weight is important is because the official tale would have us believe that skinny Lee Oswald had a grip like bench vise.    He was able to hold that 9 pound rifle by the butt, with his right hand, while he inserted it between the boxes of books (As seen in the official DPD in situ photo)    He would have had to use his left hand to balance himself as he leaned across the row of boxes.

Try this:.... Try to hold 40 inch long piece of 2X4 lumber  ( approx 2 lbs) , by the end, with one hand and place it beneath a coffee table....       This simple experiment should provide you with verification for my claim that Lee Oswald DID NOT place that 9 pond rifle into the crevice between the boxes of books as it is seen in the official DPD police photo.


According to Robert Frazier’s testimony, the rifle with the scope (and, I believe, strap) weighs 8- pounds. Watch the secret service reenactment and see how the agent casually walked across the sixth floor and sets the wooden rifle prop into the space between the boxes. The only thing that he doesn’t do is push the two boxes over the opening. That could be very quickly done. No problem…

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: The Position of the Bolt on the MC
« Reply #288 on: August 27, 2022, 08:30:57 PM »

According to Robert Frazier’s testimony, the rifle with the scope (and, I believe, strap) weighs 8- pounds. Watch the secret service reenactment and see how the agent casually walked across the sixth floor and sets the wooden rifle prop into the space between the boxes. The only thing that he doesn’t do is push the two boxes over the opening. That could be very quickly done. No problem…

Mr Collins, do you really believe that that light weight piece of dimension 1X4 is an accurate substitute for the 9 pound carcano?

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: The Position of the Bolt on the MC
« Reply #289 on: August 27, 2022, 08:55:21 PM »
Mr Collins, do you really believe that that light weight piece of dimension 1X4 is an accurate substitute for the 9 pound carcano?

8-pound Carcano, not 9.

No, of course I don’t believe it is an accurate substitute. However, it does serve the purpose well enough to make the point that if the boxes were slid over after the rifle was set down on the floor in a similar manner to the one in the reenactment, then your silly idea of having to hold the rifle by the butt end and inserting it into a covered opening from the west end is simply not relevant. In other words, there is a viable alternative to your theory.

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: The Position of the Bolt on the MC
« Reply #290 on: August 27, 2022, 09:21:52 PM »
Here's the deal.... The rifle found in the Texas School Book Depository Building was 40.2″ long and was the Carcano Fucile Modello 91/38.
This rifle weighs 7.44 lb.
No one has ever replicated the act of carrying ...unnoticed by any others... this amount of hardware in a flimsy paper sack [as described by Mr Frazier] ... the only person that the Warren gang managed to bully into half-halfheartedly fingering Lee.
Perhaps review the above post---the act of carrying an 8.3 pound parcel [unnoticed] into the bldg to begin with.
So go get a grocery sack...put a full gallon of water...=8.3 in it and see how it feels when you pick it up.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: The Position of the Bolt on the MC
« Reply #291 on: August 27, 2022, 09:22:54 PM »
8-pound Carcano, not 9.

No, of course I don’t believe it is an accurate substitute. However, it does serve the purpose well enough to make the point that if the boxes were slid over after the rifle was set down on the floor in a similar manner to the one in the reenactment, then your silly idea of having to hold the rifle by the butt end and inserting it into a covered opening from the west end is simply not relevant. In other words, there is a viable alternative to your theory.

 it does serve the purpose well enough to make the point that if the boxes were slid over after the rifle was set down on the floor.

So gravity was in aberrance there on the sixth floor?

What do you think the effect of gravity would have had on the box that is shown above the stock of the rifle ?...

If that box of books had been slid across the gap what would have prevented the south edge of the box from falling into the gap?   

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: The Position of the Bolt on the MC
« Reply #292 on: August 27, 2022, 09:40:03 PM »
it does serve the purpose well enough to make the point that if the boxes were slid over after the rifle was set down on the floor.

So gravity was in aberrance there on the sixth floor?

What do you think the effect of gravity would have had on the box that is shown above the stock of the rifle ?...

If that box of books had been slid across the gap what would have prevented the south edge of the box from falling into the gap?   


If the weight of the contents of the boxes was evenly distributed, then the boxes would be able to be slid and cantilevered so that almost half of the boxes are overhanging before the south edges start to fall. It appears to me that the south edges are barely touching the boxes below the south edges. So, if the south ends of the boxes happen to be heavier than the north ends of the boxes (due to uneven weight distribution), then using both hands (one on each end) to support the boxes while sliding them would be necessary.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: The Position of the Bolt on the MC
« Reply #293 on: August 27, 2022, 09:57:35 PM »

If the weight of the contents of the boxes was evenly distributed, then the boxes would be able to be slid and cantilevered so that almost half of the boxes are overhanging before the south edges start to fall. It appears to me that the south edges are barely touching the boxes below the south edges. So, if the south ends of the boxes happen to be heavier than the north ends of the boxes (due to uneven weight distribution), then using both hands (one on each end) to support the boxes while sliding them would be necessary.

Question....What is preventing the south edge of the box from sliding into the gap?