A Lot Of Racket About One Ditched Jacket

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A Lot Of Racket About One Ditched Jacket  (Read 32371 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: A Lot Of Racket About One Ditched Jacket
« Reply #14 on: June 12, 2022, 08:30:56 AM »
In your opinion, is Buell Frazier reliable?

How is my opinion relevant to your claim about what “we know”?

My opinion is that all witness testimony is unreliable. But can you answer my question? Knowledge is different from opinion.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8165
Re: A Lot Of Racket About One Ditched Jacket
« Reply #15 on: June 12, 2022, 01:42:40 PM »

Earlene Roberts has Oswald zipping up a jacket as he went out the door.  Nothing about "kind of" zipping up a jacket.


Which is far more than you have when arguing that Oswald was not wearing a jacket as he went out the door.

Total BS.

Roberts admitted that she wasn't paying much attention as she was concentrating on the television.
This means she had her back turned towards the living room where Oswald walked from his room to the front door.
Add to this that witness testimony is highly unreliable and that Roberts, according to Mrs Johnson, was known to make up stuff and what you are left with is nothing conclusive, whether you like it or not.

If officer Baker can mistake a shirt for a jacket than Roberts, who had poor eye sight, could just as easily have done the same.
So, no, it's not far more than arguing that Oswald was not wearing a jacket as he went out the door.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8165
Re: A Lot Of Racket About One Ditched Jacket
« Reply #16 on: June 12, 2022, 02:13:15 PM »
The problem for you is that your entire premise relies on Frazier being absolutely correct, regarding the color of the jacket Oswald was wearing Thursday evening.  If Frazier is off, then your point is invalid.  And we already know just how unreliable Frazier has been and still is.

The problem for you is that your entire premise relies on Roberts being absolutely correct, regarding the jacket.  If Roberts is off, then your point is invalid.  And we already know, from her employer, just how unreliable Roberts was.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: A Lot Of Racket About One Ditched Jacket
« Reply #17 on: June 12, 2022, 04:37:39 PM »
If officer Baker can mistake a shirt for a jacket than Roberts, who had poor eye sight, could just as easily have done the same.

That’s a really good point. Whaley too.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: A Lot Of Racket About One Ditched Jacket
« Reply #18 on: June 12, 2022, 05:09:05 PM »
How is my opinion relevant to your claim about what “we know”?

My opinion is that all witness testimony is unreliable. But can you answer my question? Knowledge is different from opinion.

My opinion is that all witness testimony is unreliable
_Does that include CTer/JAQer/OAKer fav Arnold Rowland, by any chance?


 


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: A Lot Of Racket About One Ditched Jacket
« Reply #19 on: June 12, 2022, 05:31:23 PM »
Your point here is moot.
Your point everywhere always is.

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
Re: A Lot Of Racket About One Ditched Jacket
« Reply #20 on: June 12, 2022, 06:10:51 PM »

Earlene Roberts has Oswald zipping up a jacket as he went out the door.  Nothing about "kind of" zipping up a jacket.


Which is far more than you have when arguing that Oswald was not wearing a jacket as he went out the door.

It's the typical dishonest and desperate contrarian attempt to create fake doubt by any means.  Like the endlessly repeated false claim that there is somehow doubt in Marina's WC testimony that she saw a rifle in the blanket.