A Lot Of Racket About One Ditched Jacket

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A Lot Of Racket About One Ditched Jacket  (Read 32377 times)

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8170
Re: A Lot Of Racket About One Ditched Jacket
« Reply #28 on: June 12, 2022, 10:21:21 PM »
So Oswald left in a zip-up shirt.  Got it.

Or there just was no zipper.... just like there was no police car honking outside the rooming house.

Just consider the source......


Online Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2028
Re: A Lot Of Racket About One Ditched Jacket
« Reply #29 on: June 12, 2022, 10:58:16 PM »
Or there just was no zipper.... just like there was no police car honking outside the rooming house.

Just consider the source......

Roberts mentioned the jacket to a reporter on the afternoon of the murder.

She didn't mention the horn-honking incident until about one week later once the accused assassin himself was gunned down sparking whispers of conspiracy.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8170
Re: A Lot Of Racket About One Ditched Jacket
« Reply #30 on: June 13, 2022, 12:08:13 AM »
Ramble this: YOU JUST CALLED EARLENE A LIAR

According to Johnson, her boss, she was. Deal with it.

If she wasn't a liar, she also did not lie about the police car honking in front of her house, right?
« Last Edit: June 13, 2022, 12:09:37 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8170
Re: A Lot Of Racket About One Ditched Jacket
« Reply #31 on: June 13, 2022, 12:12:19 AM »
Roberts mentioned the jacket to a reporter on the afternoon of the murder.

She didn't mention the horn-honking incident until about one week later once the accused assassin himself was gunned down sparking whispers of conspiracy.

So, what's your point?

She couldn't have made a mistake (like Baker and Whaley did) and didn't lie about the zipper on day one, but she did concoct and lie about this police car a week later?

That's some reliable witness, you've got there!  Thumb1:

Henry Wade must have busted for joy when Oswald was killed and saved him from having to go to trial with fruitcakes like Roberts as his best witnesses.
« Last Edit: June 13, 2022, 12:15:27 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Online Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2028
Re: A Lot Of Racket About One Ditched Jacket
« Reply #32 on: June 13, 2022, 12:14:57 AM »
So, what's your point?

She couldn't have made a mistake (like Baker and Whaley did) and didn't lie about the zipper on day one, but she did concoct and lie about this police car a week later?

That's some reliable witness, you've got there!  Thumb1:

Again, you're ignoring the fact that Roberts said Oswald was zipping up the jacket as he went out.  This is a specific recall.

You're jumping through every hoop possible in order to not have to provide an explanation for why Oswald was seen on Jefferson with no jacket.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8170
Re: A Lot Of Racket About One Ditched Jacket
« Reply #33 on: June 13, 2022, 12:22:11 AM »
Again, you're ignoring the fact that Roberts said Oswald was zipping up the jacket as he went out.  This is a specific recall.

You're jumping through every hoop possible in order to not have to provide an explanation for why Oswald was seen on Jefferson with no jacket.

Again, you're ignoring the fact that Roberts said Oswald was zipping up the jacket as he went out.  This is a specific recall.

Just like Baker recalled seeing Oswald wearing a jacket.

You're jumping through every hoop possible in order to not have to provide an explanation for why Oswald was seen on Jefferson with no jacket.

Oswald was on Jefferson? Really?

The one jumping through hoops is you. Your already weak house of cards comes tumbling down if Roberts was wrong. So, you desperately need to rely on a woman who wasn't paying much attention, has bad eye sight and only saw Oswald for a few seconds as he walked out of the door. Even if she had seen hem walk the entire distance between his room and the front door, she would have had only 5 seconds to observe him (I timed it when I was there). But she had her back turned to him as the TV was in front of the window looking out on Beckley. She most likely only saw him for two seconds at best as he reached and opened the front door. Good luck trying to argue that she was 100% correct in her observations.

If you were only 10% honest, you would admit that Roberts is a very weak and unreliable witness at best, but when it comes to honesty, I'm probably talking to the wrong person.
« Last Edit: June 13, 2022, 01:39:01 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: A Lot Of Racket About One Ditched Jacket
« Reply #34 on: June 13, 2022, 01:52:32 AM »
Roberts mentioned the jacket to a reporter on the afternoon of the murder.

She didn't mention the horn-honking incident until about one week later once the accused assassin himself was gunned down sparking whispers of conspiracy.

I love the blatant double-standard here. When did Brennan first mention that the guy he saw was Oswald? When did Carl Day first say he lifted a print? When did Charles Givens first say he saw Oswald on the sixth floor walking away from the SE corner?