Hoover’s effort to “convince the public that Oswald” was lone assassin…

[Walt Cakebread]

What have you been smoking now?
The topic based on that cornjecture should then be--- 'Hoover's effort to convince the public that Cuba or the Soviets were not involved'
Your spookulations permeates the entire forum.
     
         
What is obvious to you is comical to everyone else here with any inkling of skepticism.

What is obvious to you is comical to everyone else here with any inkling of skepticism.

Richard's ideas  would be "comical".... if they weren't so pathetic. 

[Richard Smith]

What have you been smoking now?
The topic based on that cornjecture should then be--- 'Hoover's effort to convince the public that Cuba or the Soviets were not involved'
Your spookulations permeates the entire forum.
     
         
What is obvious to you is comical to everyone else here with any inkling of skepticism.

Read the title of this thread and try to understand the implication.  Why was it necessary to "convince" the public of Oswald's guilt?  One interpretation is that Hoover and members of the US government placed the blame for the assassination on LHO to cover up the involvement of others.  Right?  You believe something along those lines.  So who are the typical suspects behind the assassination?  Granted CTers are all over the place but Oswald's nutty political background including defecting to the USSR and making trips to the Cuban embassy just months before the assassination lends itself to Russia and Cuba as being involved in the assassination.  In fact, CTers like Walt have suggested that blame was placed on Oswald to avoid war.  Meaning that the Hoover and LBJ knew the Cubans or Russians were really behind the assassination, and rather than go to war, they made a patsy of Oswald.  The lunacy of that kind of thinking is on your side, however.  It's comical not to understanding that you are mocking the basic premise of your own theory.  There was a legitimate basis to conclude: 1) Oswald was the assassin; and 2) there was a risk that the public might falsely be convinced of the involvement of Russia or Cuba based on Oswald's background and the dishonesty of CTers such as Mark Lane that could result in WWIII.  Thankfully sane people were in charge at that time.

[Martin Weidmann]

It seems obvious.  If the public were convinced that the Russians or Cubans were behind the assassination of the US President, that would be deemed an act of war.  Necessitating a military response.  In fact, some CTers alleged the involvement of Russia/Cuba was actually covered up and the blame placed solely on LHO to avoid a war.  Any CTer (such as Mark Lane) who was attempting to convince the public of a fake conspiracy risked causing WWIII.

It seems obvious. If the public were convinced that the Russians or Cubans were behind the assassination of the US President, that would be deemed an act of war. Necessitating a military response.

Really? The President has been killed by the Russians or Cubans, so just because the public wants it, let's nuke them and blow up the entire world, including ourselves. That seems obvious to you? You can't be this naive...

In fact, some CTers alleged the involvement of Russia/Cuba was actually covered up and the blame placed solely on LHO to avoid a war.

And others think that the alleged involvement of Russia/Cuba was just an excuse to cover up what really happened and put the blame on Oswald alone.

The whole idea of WWIII over the assassination of a President is just as idiotic as the nuclear arms race itself was. Sure, if Russia or Cuba were involved (which I seriously doubt they were), there would be a major political crisis but no regime would be stupid enough to fire the first nuke, as selfdestruction would most certainly follow.

[Walt Cakebread]

Name the "crazy conspiracy theorists" who were pressuring for war?

And while you're at it, why don't you tell us precisely, how those "responsible leaders" of the US would get the country into WWIII because of the murder of Kennedy, regardless whether a lone nut or a conspiracy was behind it?

Name the "crazy conspiracy theorists" who were pressuring for war?

Hi Martin, I can name one without searching my memory for others.... Curtis Le May

[Jerry Freeman]

  The President has been killed by the Russians or Cubans, so just because the public wants it, let's nuke them and blow up the entire world, including ourselves. That seems obvious to you? You can't be this naive...

                                                   Can....is 

[David Von Pein]

Any clown can accuse somebody of something, so?

[...]

888 pages of lies and deception.

Anybody can pretend there's "no evidence" against Oswald. But such a ridiculous activity, which is something that Internet CTers engage in daily, won't make the evidence against him cease to exist.

It would appear as though most conspiracy theorists still haven't figured out the above basic truth---even 58 years after the evidence was collected.

~shrug~

http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2014/09/was-all-of-this-evidence-planted.html

[David Von Pein]

Remember what happened when you claimed rock solid chain of possession of #2 on your list?

The two non-Poe shells indeed do have a rock-solid chain of custody. All CTer protests to the contrary notwithstanding, of course.