Truly's False Roll

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Truly's False Roll  (Read 86173 times)

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: Truly's False Roll
« Reply #70 on: March 06, 2022, 06:43:16 PM »
And Eddie Piper’s mentioning it to others could have even been what brought it to Truly’s attention.

This was your initial claim which would have been a nobrainer for Truly to tell the commission.

Instead he kooked up some subconscious BS on top of a timeline that didn't work.

So much for your impossible possibility, it's simply disconnected from what Truly said.


There is nothing impossible about what I said. WTF are you blabbering about?

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: Truly's False Roll
« Reply #71 on: March 06, 2022, 09:09:37 PM »
Sure, everything is possible but highly improbable that Truly wouldn't have said so if it happened.

You simply launched a counter argument that totally flopped.

Suck it up and move on.


I launched no counter argument. I brought up a valid and relevant point and a possibility. That is all. On the other hand, you have contributed exactly nothing of value whatsoever.

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Truly's False Roll
« Reply #72 on: March 06, 2022, 10:34:39 PM »
Speaking of Mr Kent Biffle, here's what he wrote on the evening of 11/22:



Cf! New York Herald Tribune, 11/23:



There were two storage rooms on the first floor:

« Last Edit: March 06, 2022, 10:43:03 PM by Alan Ford »

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: Truly's False Roll
« Reply #73 on: March 07, 2022, 01:54:28 AM »
BS:

Previously...

That, I consider to be significant to counter the silly argument that Truly had sinister intentions.

Here is that sentence in context with the rest of that post:

I brought up the fact that Eddie Piper said that he noticed Oswald missing and mentioned it to some others. That, I consider to be significant to counter the silly argument that Truly had sinister intentions. Do you have anything to say that actually adds to the conversation?

The sentence you have chosen to take out of context and twist was written simply to state why I brought that fact up. This was done because you tried to twist another sentence and pretend that I brought something up that didn't matter. What I stated doesn't matter is who out of the several people who said that they noticed Oswald missing actually noticed Oswald missing first. Now, if you or anyone else wants to argue against the fact that Eddie Piper said what he did, please do.

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Truly's False Roll
« Reply #74 on: March 07, 2022, 05:23:52 AM »
Speaking of Mr Kent Biffle, here's what he wrote on the evening of 11/22:



Cf! New York Herald Tribune, 11/23:



There were two storage rooms on the first floor:



Notice Campbell says "shortly after the shooting we raced back into the building" and that alao includes Sarah Stanton who confirmed that in her FBI statement. 

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: Truly's False Roll
« Reply #75 on: March 07, 2022, 12:43:12 PM »
Your possibility does not counter anything, that's the unpleasant fact you need to deal with.


Frankly, there is nothing to counter. The whole idea that Truly lied for some sinister purpose has no reasonable foundation to counter. It is just another unfounded ridiculous idea.

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: Truly's False Roll
« Reply #76 on: March 07, 2022, 02:13:17 PM »
It was you who introduced the counter thing "to counter" something and you now claim it's unnecessary -- ROFL

BTW, why would employee contact information include hair color?

Representative FORD. In your description of Oswald to Captain Fritz, did you describe the kind of clothes that Oswald had on that day?

Mr. TRULY. I don't know, sir. No, sir; I just told him his name and where he lived and his telephone number and his age, as 23, and I said 5 feet, 9, about 150 pounds, light brown hair--whatever I picked up off the description there. I did not try to depend on my memory to describe him. I just put down what was on this application blank. That's the reason I called Mr. Aiken, because I did not want to mislead anybody as to a description. I might call a man brown-halted, and he might be blonde.


Another example of a kook trying to make something out of nothing.  ::)