Questions For Buell Wesley Frazier

[Charles Collins]

So, you don't know? I asked you because I was pretty sure you didn't know. It seems I was right.

You have a strange kind of understanding of what credible evidence is....

An understandable move on your part. Saves you from having to answer questions you can't answer and allows you to just run wild with self-serving assumptions and speculation, which you of course, rather foolishly, call 'evidence'.

A typical end to a discussion with you. You run out of relevant arguments and start attacking the messenger.

[Charles Collins]

What prevented you this time?

Not a thing. I said that it was my tendency, not an ironclad rule.

[Martin Weidmann]

A typical end to a discussion with you. You run out of relevant arguments and start attacking the messenger.

Is the discussion over then? Sorry, I wasn't aware of that.

And what makes you think I've run out of relevant arguments? Jumping to conclusions again?

How did I "attack" you?

[Charles Collins]

So, what could prevent you?

If you want to discuss the JFK assassination case please do. Questions about other things are irrelevant.

[Mark A. Oblazney]

The one that got ever shorter re Buell & Linnie as 'you-show-me yours, I'll-show-you-mine' time loomed ever nearer at the 'kiss my arse/kiss 'n tell' WC hearings

this was your best one heh heh heh

[Bill Chapman]

this was your best one heh heh heh

Good over-the shoulder-catch right there.

[Jerry Freeman]

How tall is Rather compared to Oswald?
Rather wrapped the bag tightly around the barrel, to reduce the size of the visible part. There is no evidence that Oswald did the same. In fact, iirc Randle said Oswald was holding the top of the package which was folded.

Frazier could only have known that Oswald carried the package under his armpit if he actually saw Oswald put it there. If he had seen Oswald's back he couldn't know this detail.