Are the Autopsy Photos authentic?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Are the Autopsy Photos authentic?  (Read 72863 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Are the Autopsy Photos authentic?
« Reply #35 on: March 06, 2018, 10:43:18 PM »
           If we are to believe the Massive Explosion that is depicted above, Jackie's face would have been absolutely covered with Blood/Brain Matter.

Maybe she ate it.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Are the Autopsy Photos authentic?
« Reply #36 on: March 06, 2018, 11:19:21 PM »
It looks like Jackie is moving forward too, was she shot as well..??

You're imagining things. Jackie cannot be seen to move forward.

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5120
Re: Are the Autopsy Photos authentic?
« Reply #37 on: March 07, 2018, 12:34:21 AM »
"Stop disagreeing with my conclusions".







 ;D

How ironic you just illustrated my point exactly, CT's who are absolutely besotted with Oswald and imagine themselves to be his defence attorney, see just what they want to see.

Btw what's to disagree with? The millions of depth mapped pixels showing clean rotation illustrate the same event, that's why I prefer using them because we don't see the empty headed response as above.





JohnM

Offline Mike Orr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 401
Re: Are the Autopsy Photos authentic?
« Reply #38 on: March 07, 2018, 01:16:59 AM »
Motorcycle Policeman B. W. Hargis , " I was splattered with blood."  " Then I felt something hit me". It could have been concrete or something , but I thought at first " I might have been hit ".
 "THEN I SAW THE LIMOUSINE STOP", and I parked my motorcycle at the side of the road , got off and drew my gun .  It's kind of odd that Hargis said he saw the limousine stop but the ZAPRUDER FILM SHOWS NO STOPPING OF THE LIMO AT ALL . How could that be ?

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5120
Re: Are the Autopsy Photos authentic?
« Reply #39 on: March 07, 2018, 01:21:28 AM »
Perhaps you missed this from my series. It will answer all your questions.

****************************************

The Warren Commission (WC) said that President John F. Kennedy (JFK) was shot from behind ONLY, thus, NO wounds should have been seen on the backside of JFK?s  head (save for a small entrance wound), but many witnesses did see such a wound.

How can the WC defenders explain this?


***************************************

snip






Maybe next time, just post a link because I can almost guarantee that Brian couldn't give a stuff about reading a wall of your self serving evidence.
And besides it just makes the Forum look messy.



JohnM
« Last Edit: March 07, 2018, 02:21:48 AM by John Mytton »

Offline Joe Elliott

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1845
Re: Are the Autopsy Photos authentic?
« Reply #40 on: March 07, 2018, 01:57:01 AM »


John Mytton is from Australia. So, I doubt that he voted for Trump. I never voted for Trump. Neither did Jerry Organ or Bill Chapman. John's stereoscopic use of the photos demonstrates for us that they are genuine. And of course, there's the 20 or so members of the HSCA Photographic analysis panel who examined them and confirmed their authenticity. As did the Bethesda pathologists and photographer. But you know better, right?


Ditto. I voted for Hillary Clinton because she was a better choice than Trump. We don?t need no stupid wall.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Are the Autopsy Photos authentic?
« Reply #41 on: March 07, 2018, 03:52:24 AM »
The only reason Trump won was because he was running against Hillary.

Yup.