U.S. And International Politics

[Jarrett Smith]

Under Trump it is fascism.
How about them Epstein files huh? 38,000 times

If the Epstein files were true democrats would have used them in 2016.

[Tom Graves]

If the Epstein files were true Democrats would have used them in 2016.

Not if "former" KGB counterintelligence officer Vladimir Putin and/or his predecessors -- aided by Ghislaine's dad -- had made sure that high-powered Republicans *and* high-powered Democrats were implicated.

D'oh!

[Michael Capasse]

If the Epstein files were true democrats would have used them in 2016.

Epstein files were sealed in 2016. Nobody could.

[John Corbett]

Not if "former" KGB counterintelligence officer Vladimir Putin and/or his predecessors -- aided by Ghislaine's dad -- had made sure that high-powered Republicans *and* high-powered Democrats were implicated.

D'oh!

Another example of PDS.

If the Epstein files had anything damaging to Trump, Biden's puppet masters would definitely have leaked them in October of 2024. The one politician most likely to have been tarred by the Epstein files was Bill Clinton and leaking that material would not have helped Kamala. Of course, she was such a loseer, I doubt anything could have helped her.

I'd love to see Kamala nominated again in 2028, with AOC as her running mate, but I doubt even the Dems are that dumb. The Dems have found a winning formula. Nominate a far left socialist and have them run as a moderate Democrat, then after they get elected, they show their true colors. I don't think they could pull that off if the pick Kamala again.

[John Corbett]

Epstein files were sealed in 2016. Nobody could.

The people who sealed them could unseal them if they chose. That would be the Obama administration. My guess is they were trying to protect Biill Clinton. Not that the Obamas and Clintons had any great love for each other but Obama would have done that for the good of the party. Anything damaging to Bill would have had collateral damage to Hillary.

[Michael Capasse]

The people who sealed them could unseal them if they chose. That would be the Obama administration. My guess is they were trying to protect Biill Clinton. Not that the Obamas and Clintons had any great love for each other but Obama would have done that for the good of the party. Anything damaging to Bill would have had collateral damage to Hillary.

Obama could not.
In 2016, they were under Grand Jury Seal and could not be opened without formal legal petitions and judicial approval.

[John Corbett]

Obama could not.
In 2016, they were under Grand Jury Seal and could not be opened without formal legal petitions and judicial approval.

I'm sure they could have shopped for a friendly federal judge