U.S. And International Politics

[Royell Storing]

My guess is that they know the total registered number of voters and they estimate how many of those will vote based on past experience.  That provides a benchmark figure on the estimated total vote count to be used to determine the percentage of total votes counted.  I don't think the 54% counted necessarily means that 80% of those were mail in votes.  In all likelihood, the votes cast in person at the polls are tabulated much faster meaning they provide a much higher percentage of the initial vote count.   The reason the republicans always get off to a great start is because they get higher margins at the polls, then dems make up ground as the mail in votes are s-l-o-w-l-y counted. 

It doesn't seem like voters at the polls would be statistically any different than voters who mail in their votes but the latter always goes much more heavily dem.   What we need is a national voting holiday that ends early voting and requires everyone to show up at the polls.  That is how elections were conducted for centuries with no issues or delays.  Even before computers.  If they want Americans to have confidence in election results, require people to vote in person and provide ID.  The votes can then be counted within hours.

   There is NO "ESTIMATE" placed alongside the "% Counted" numbers released by the State Of California. The "% Counted" is a Hard Number just like the running Vote Totals for each candidate.
  Calif claims that 80% of VOTES are RECEIVED BY MAIL. This means the total votes for PRATT and HILTON on election night were 80% MAIL IN BALLOTS. Hilton was leading and Pratt running 2nd on Election night with 80% of their vote totals that night being RECEIVED BY MAIL. Now, all the sudden the MAIL IN BALLOTS are seeing them losing better than 2-1? This defies the election day math. And there was OVER 50% counted on Election DAY. This is flat out Election Fraud, and the basic math supports that claim.