Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: 1/6 Insurrection Investigation  (Read 234807 times)

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: 1/6 Insurrection Investigation
« Reply #560 on: June 01, 2022, 04:44:15 PM »

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: 1/6 Insurrection Investigation
« Reply #561 on: June 02, 2022, 11:24:31 AM »
Trial set for June 13 in high-profile Capitol breach case of Kevin Seefried, who is the man carrying the Confederate flag through the Capitol on Jan 6, 2021, according to prosecutors.




Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: 1/6 Insurrection Investigation
« Reply #562 on: June 02, 2022, 11:37:34 AM »
SENTENCING set for July 13 in US Capitol riot case of David Blair, who pleaded guilty to a felony.

Feds say Blair was "waving a Confederate battle flag attached to a lacrosse stick. He yelled words to the effect of “hell naw, quit backing up, don’t be scared”

Facing up to 5 years.


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: 1/6 Insurrection Investigation
« Reply #563 on: June 02, 2022, 12:09:18 PM »
Old man Chuck Grassley was a key figure in Trump's coup attempt.

NEW: Trump lawyer Kenneth Chesebro said in 13 Dec 2020 memo to Giuliani that VP Pence should recuse himself from running the electoral count and hand the gavel to a senior GOP senator like Graham — recall that Sen. Grassley said on Jan. 5 he didn’t expect Pence to preside.


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: 1/6 Insurrection Investigation
« Reply #564 on: June 02, 2022, 12:28:03 PM »
Remember when a judge determined that one of John Eastman's emails was subject to the "crime-fraud" exception to attorney-client privilege?

That document — a Dec. 13, 2020 memo to Rudy Giuliani — was just made public in new court filings.

Read it below:

https://www.politico.com/minutes/congress/06-1-2022/jan-6/


The memo, authored by attorney Kenneth Chesebro, described what he called the "'President of the Senate' strategy," an effort to convince Mike Pence to assert control of the Jan. 6 count of electoral votes.




Chesebro's memo lays out a day-to-day plan of action beginning Jan. 3 with hearings by Sen. Graham. A Graham spokesman emphasized that no hearings were ever held but declined to address whether Graham was ever approached about this strategy.




On Jan. 6, Chesebro recommended that Pence attend but recuse himself from the actual count, allowing a senior senator like Chuck Grassley to take the gavel. This would keep his hands clean from the fight about to ensue over electors.






Chesebro then argued to let the chips fall. No one could predict what SCOTUS would do and Trump could very well still lose, he said. But he said the effort would be worth it and could even result in an unexpected outcome, like Pence becoming president.


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: 1/6 Insurrection Investigation
« Reply #565 on: June 02, 2022, 03:46:29 PM »
Primer on the Hearings of the January 6th Select Committee
https://www.justsecurity.org/81729/covering-the-january-6th-select-committee-a-primer/

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: 1/6 Insurrection Investigation
« Reply #566 on: June 02, 2022, 04:19:37 PM »
Who is Cassidy Hutchinson and what has she told the Jan. 6 committee?

The House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection has kept a tight lid on its plans for televised hearings slated to take place this month, but that hasn’t stopped speculation about who might be called to testify.

Among the names that have been floated as a potential witness in the highly anticipated hearings is that of Cassidy Hutchinson, an aide to former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, who has already been cited as the source of multiple revelations uncovered by the select committee’s probe.

Hutchinson, who served as a special assistant to the president for legislative affairs, was subpoenaed in November 2021, along with several other former Trump administration officials who, the panel believed, had relevant information regarding the former president’s activities on Jan. 6 and the role he and his aides played in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

According to her subpoena, Hutchinson was not only at the White House on Jan. 6 but she’d been with Trump during his speech at the “Stop the Steal” rally on the Ellipse, where he urged his supporters to “fight like hell” before promising to march with them to the Capitol.

She also emailed Georgia officials directly following Meadows’s trip to attend that state’s election audit, according to the subpoena, and was present for other key meetings and conversations at the White House leading up to Jan. 6.

Unlike her former boss, whose refusal to cooperate with House investigators has earned him a Justice Department referral for criminal contempt charges, Hutchinson has appeared before the committee on three separate occasions since the beginning of this year. In fact, following her most recent deposition last month, a source reportedly told CNN that Hutchinson believes she’s being forced to testify due to Meadows’s refusal to comply with his own subpoena. The same source said Hutchinson will likely make another appearance before the committee, possibly during the upcoming public hearings, according to CNN.

A spokesperson for the Jan. 6 committee declined to comment on whether Hutchinson will be called as a witness at the hearings, the first of which is set for June 9. Hutchinson’s attorney did not respond to a request for comment from Yahoo News.

While much remains unknown about what Hutchinson has told the select committee so far, a handful of key details have emerged from her closed-door depositions that seem likely to feature prominently in the case House investigators hope to present to the American public this summer.

Here’s a look at some of the key revelations that have already been attributed to Hutchinson, and how they might factor into the public hearings.

Meadows and others pressed ahead with plans to overturn Trump’s election loss, court filing says, even after White House counsel had deemed them not “legally sound.”

The select committee’s legal battle against Meadows, who has sued to block the panel’s subpoenas, may offer clues on how Hutchinson’s testimony could be used in the hearings.

In an April court filing, the select committee cited sections of Hutchinson’s testimony as proof of the former chief’s involvement in the effort to overturn the results of the 2020 election and that he had pursued unlawful plans to make that happen.

According to the filing, Hutchinson told the committee that the White House Counsel’s Office repeatedly objected on legal grounds to a plan to push Republican officials in battleground states that had voted for Biden to send alternate, pro-Trump slates of electors to Congress when lawmakers met on Jan. 6 to certify the Electoral College vote count.

Hutchinson told the committee that the counsel’s office had concluded that the alternate electors plan was not legally sound potentially as early as November 2021, and that this conclusion was raised during multiple meetings at the White House involving Meadows, other Trump associates like Trump’s former personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, and members of Congress including Reps. Scott Perry, R-Pa., Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., and Louie Gohmert, R-Texas.

“Despite that advice, the plan moved forward,” the committee’s filing states.

https://news.yahoo.com/who-is-cassidy-hutchinson-and-what-has-she-told-the-jan-6-committee-214435600.html