Streets of Philadelphia

[Martin Weidmann]

A woman arrested for silently praying is a "religious zealot", "religious nutjob" and "religious fanatic" according to Martin.  See any theme?  But without missing a beat, he tells us this has nothing to do with religion.  HA HA HA.  Unreal.   No one said anything about the subject of abortion.  The obvious point is that leftist have created this "zone" around an abortion clinic as a pretext for arresting peaceful dissenters because abortion is a sacred leftist cause.  It is a way for the authoritarians to suppress free speech and religious liberties via a zoning regulation.  Then argue, as you have stupidly done, that this all has nothing to do with religious liberties.  Whether abortion is good, bad or indifferent is not the issue.  This woman was singled out for prosecution because she dared to dissent against abortion.  Not because she committed any crime.

Why don't you fly to Birmingham and tell it to the Judge and Jury at her trial, troll.

[Richard Smith]

Why don't you fly to Birmingham and tell it to the Judge and Jury at her trial, troll.

Such an angry guy.  Make you a deal.  I'll do that when you go to the NY Times or Tucker Carlson and provide them with your "evidence" that Oswald "didn't come down the stairs."  Thereby proving a conspiracy in the assassination of the US president.  HA HA HA.  Make sure to bring a suitcase because the mental health authorities may offer you accommodations for a lengthy stay.

[Martin Weidmann]

Such an angry guy.  Make you a deal.  I'll do that when you go to the NY Times or Tucker Carlson and provide them with your "evidence" that Oswald "didn't come down the stairs."  Thereby proving a conspiracy in the assassination of the US president.  HA HA HA.  Make sure to bring a suitcase because the mental health authorities may offer you accommodations for a lengthy stay.

There it is again; desperation on full display! Dishonestly asking for evidence of something that didn't happen in order to weasel out of another mess he has gotten himself into.

Not the first time and it won't be the last. 

[Richard Smith]

There it is again; desperation on full display! Dishonestly asking for evidence of something that didn't happen in order to weasel out of another mess he has gotten himself into.

Not the first time and it won't be the last. 

So I guess I won't be reading about your idiotic claim in the NY Times that you have proven a conspiracy to kill JFK.  Oswald "didn't come down the stairs"!  LOL.  That's a shame since it would have meant a Pulitzer Prize for you.  I wonder why you are so reluctant to bring this to the attention of the world outside this forum.  Some dim awareness that you are a fraud?  Maybe that is the source of your anger.  Self-loathing.

[Martin Weidmann]

So I guess I won't be reading about your idiotic claim in the NY Times that you have proven a conspiracy to kill JFK.  Oswald "didn't come down the stairs"!  LOL.  That's a shame since it would have meant a Pulitzer Prize for you.  I wonder why you are so reluctant to bring this to the attention of the world outside this forum.  Some dim awareness that you are a fraud?  Maybe that is the source of your anger.  Self-loathing.

your idiotic claim in the NY Times that you have proven a conspiracy to kill JFK

And yet another lie from Richard. I never made such a claim

Oswald "didn't come down the stairs"!  LOL.

That's the only correct conclusion as all the available evidence points to that and you have failed miserably, for six months now, to provide a shred of evidence for your bogus claim that Oswald did come down the stairs unnoticed within 75 seconds after the last shot.

The only question that really needs to be asked is; "why am I wasting my time telling this to a brainless dishonest troll?"

[Richard Smith]

your idiotic claim in the NY Times that you have proven a conspiracy to kill JFK

And yet another lie from Richard. I never made such a claim

Oswald "didn't come down the stairs"!  LOL.

That's the only correct conclusion as all the available evidence points to that and you have failed miserably, for six months now, to provide a shred of evidence for your bogus claim that Oswald did come down the stairs unnoticed within 75 seconds after the last shot.

The only question that really needs to be asked is; "why am I wasting my time telling this to a brainless dishonest troll?"

If Oswald "didn't come down the stairs," then he couldn't have been the assassin on the 6th floor because those stairs were the only way for him to have made it to the 2nd floor lunchroom in the known timeframe.  If Oswald wasn't the 6th floor assassin, then someone else must have assassinated JFK and planted the evidence to frame Oswald for the crime.  That means Oswald wasn't the assassin and there was a conspiracy.  But Martin denies he is suggesting there was a conspiracy in reaching his idiotic conclusion about Oswald not coming down the stairs!  HA HA HA.  Every fact exists in a vacuum in his contrarian world having no impact on any other action.  So Oswald not coming down the stairs after the assassination is the end of his analysis.  Its implications are left unaddressed.  HA HA HA.  And the mandatory personal insults and commentary.  It's amazing that he can't make a single post that avoids an insult.  So angry and unable to control his emotions.  Like a petulant child learning there is no Santa Claus.

[Martin Weidmann]

If Oswald "didn't come down the stairs," then he couldn't have been the assassin on the 6th floor because those stairs were the only way for him to have made it to the 2nd floor lunchroom in the known timeframe.  If Oswald wasn't the 6th floor assassin, then someone else must have assassinated JFK and planted the evidence to frame Oswald for the crime.  That means Oswald wasn't the assassin and there was a conspiracy.  But Martin denies he is suggesting there was a conspiracy in reaching his idiotic conclusion about Oswald not coming down the stairs!  HA HA HA.  Every fact exists in a vacuum in his contrarian world having no impact on any other action.  So Oswald not coming down the stairs after the assassination is the end of his analysis.  Its implications are left unaddressed.  HA HA HA.  And the mandatory personal insults and commentary.  It's amazing that he can't make a single post that avoids an insult.  So angry and unable to control his emotions.  Like a petulant child learning there is no Santa Claus.

If Oswald "didn't come down the stairs," then he couldn't have been the assassin on the 6th floor because those stairs were the only way for him to have made it to the 2nd floor lunchroom in the known timeframe.  If Oswald wasn't the 6th floor assassin, then someone else must have assassinated JFK and planted the evidence to frame Oswald for the crime.  That means Oswald wasn't the assassin and there was a conspiracy.

Those are logical conclusions, which is why it is so important to provide conclusive evidence for Oswald being on the 6th floor when the shots were fired and coming down the stairs within 75 seconds after the last shot. For 6 months now you have failed miserably to provide even a shred of evidence that puts Oswald on the 6th floor and coming down the stairs. Your assumption that he was isn't evidence!

So Oswald not coming down the stairs after the assassination is the end of his analysis.

Indeed. That's what the available evidence allows. Anything beyond that would be pure speculation. I've told you a long time ago that I don't care if Oswald did it alone or if there was a conspiracy. All I am interested in is finding out just how strong or weak the case against Oswald is. For that all I need to do is scrutinize the available evidence. Unlike you, I don't have to make up stuff