Ignoring Evidence in Favor of Oswald

[Bill Chapman]

Wow, same bad attitude, same subject interests it's like Weidmann never left. LMFAOYFD!

JohnM

Good one. And YFD#2, if you will, is still here, lurking.

[Izraul Hidashi]

Thank you for your feedback, because it is appreciated. And after all, this is a place to discuss these things. And I respect your opinions. But the fact you only focused on the Paraffin aspect seems a little odd to me.

What about everything else that poses a problem for a guilty verdict? Surely it's important and well worth discussing. Did you intentionally ignore it because of the problems it poses, or were you just not interested in reading about those things? I certainly wouldn't blame you for wanting to stay away from discussing those types of things if you're one of the people willing to ignore his own common sense in favor of believing a habitual lying government... Just saying.

[Bill Chapman]

Chapman has a file on me....AWESOME.

Now that I've busted his attempt to spin his school grade thing as being about job opportunities, we're back to what it's about: Cherry picking witnesses.

Let's watch our self-proclaimed genius explain why trashing a witness based on school grade is different from trashing a witness based on color.

Get over yourself: where did I indicate I had a file on you in particular? On the contrary, I don't have even one folder with your name on it. Bottom line is that I outed you on your "race card" denial. Period.

[Bill Chapman]

Thank you for your feedback, because it is appreciated. And after all, this is a place to discuss these things. And I respect your opinions. But the fact you only focused on the Paraffin aspect seems a little odd to me.

What about everything else that poses a problem for a guilty verdict? Surely it's important and well worth discussing. Did you intentionally ignore it because of the problems it poses, or were you just not interested in reading about those things? I certainly wouldn't blame you for wanting to stay away from discussing those types of things if you're one of the people willing to ignore his own common sense in favor of believing a habitual lying government... Just saying.

You talkin' to me? Are you talking to me? Your post directly follows mine..

'Taxi Driver' (1976) Robert DeNiro/Jody Foster/Harvey Keitel

[John Mytton]

we're back to what it's about: Cherry picking witnesses.

WOW, that's exactly what you're doing, you've cherry picked Guinyard as your sole explanation that Oswald wasn't there or something, but you fail to acknowledge all the other eyewitnesses who identified Oswald or an armed gunman moving in the same direction.

Mr. BENAVIDES - ...and then he turned to the left there and went on down Patton Street.

Mr. BALL. He was walking towards what street?
Mrs. V DAVIS. He was going down Patton.

Mr. BELIN. Away from Patton or towards Patton?
Mrs. B DAVIS. Towards Patton.

Mr. BALL. Toward Patton?
Mrs. MARKHAM. Yes, sir; towards Patton.

Mr. SCOGGINS. .... and I looked up and seen him going south on Patton and then when I jumped back in my cab I called my dispatcher.

Mr. REYNOLDS OK; our office is up high where I can have a pretty good view of what was going on. I heard the shots and, when I heard the shots, I went out on this front porch which is, like I say, high, and I saw this man coming down the street with the gun in his hand, swinging it just like he was running. He turned the corner of Patton and Jefferson, going west, and put the gun in his pants and took off, walking.

HAROLD RUSSELL "observed a young white man running south on Patton Avenue carrying a pistol or revolver"

B. M. PATTERSON "advised that at approximately 1:30 PM,...  a white male approximately 30 years of age, running south on Patton Avenue, carrying what appeared to be a revolver in his hand"

L. J. LEWIS... "he observed a white male, approximately thirty years of age, running south on Patton Avenue, carrying either an automatic pistol or a revolver in his hands"



JohnM

[Bill Chapman]

Get over yourself: where did I indicate I had a file on you in particular? On the contrary, I don't have even one folder with your name on it.
That seriously hurt, but I'll get over it in a couple of days.

Bottom line is that I outed you on your "race card" denial.
No doubt you're far out somewhere with your race obsession.

Period.
I'm not too concerned, likely a handful of edits in the pipeline, I'll check back.

I edit on the fly. Period. Not my bad if you lot just can't seem to wait for my attention.

I had no idea that Guinyard was a man of colour until you brought it up via your 'race card' slur. Thanks for the heads up.

[Bill Chapman]

Your argument is moot, but comes as no surprise.

If witnesses were a problem the ones watching the actual shooting could have been eliminated but they weren't.

Neither was Guinyard passed at 10 feet, you FAIL again.

Pretty sure Oswald would be more concerned about encountering more cops, dumb or otherwise. What could Markham do to stop him? Hit him with her purse? Maybe scream him to death?

You're the one who claimed Guinyard @10 feet
I'm the one sticking with Callaway @55 feet
Want to see my record of that? See below.