JFK Was Shot From The Front

[Tim Nickerson]

Edward Reed, a radiology technician on duty when the X-rays were taken at Bethesda Naval Hospital, told the House Select Committee on Assassinations that President Kennedy’s head wound was “very large and located in the right hemisphere in the occipital region.”

GUNN: Did you see any wounds on the back of his head?
REED: No.
............
GUNN: Did you see any wounds at all on his head?
REED: Yes, I did.
GUNN: Could you describe where those wounds were?
REED: It was in the temporal parietal region, right side. I could - It was large enough that I could probably put four fingers into it.

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=794#relPageId=7

[John Mytton]

Like "Mytton" would know how much time was required for "any alteration".

Oh really? Just a small part of my work which was selected from hours of uploaded videos is below and just in the first few minutes of this video, I have edited together images with way over 10 layers including a number of elements independently moving in what would have been called a travelling matte and I didn't have to approximate the movement by hand because I set the computer to follow a smooth path and my digital cut-outs were far easier than cutting out objects with a sharp knife and at the end of the day just this short sequence against a non moving background took a very long time, so yeah I have a much better idea than 99% of the CT members here, who don't know how stupid they look when they make baseless accusations.

JohnM

[Dan O'meara]

Just as the autopsy report says nothing about the front of the head, the autopsy report  says nothing about the top of the head.

And in 1967, after the Justice Department had the pathologists “examine the X-rays and photographs for the purpose of determining whether they are consistent with the autopsy report,” the pathologists  signed a document stating that the autopsy photos show a “massive” wound located on the “right side of the head,” which “corroborates” the pathologists’ autopsy report.

So, the massive exit wound was on the side of the head.

No wait! The massive exit wound was at the top of the head.

Or the massive exit wound was at the front of the head.

The massive exit wound can be anywhere except at the rear of the head.

KGB officers inside the CIA assassinated President Kennedy. It’s all in my book. Click the link.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07V9JT65Y

You're experiencing something I call "unseeing".
You've spent many hours on something, invested a large part of yourself in a theory.
Now you can see with your own eyes you are mistaken.
Rather than do that, you "unsee" the images before you.
Don't worry, nearly every single member of this forum suffers from the same affliction.

If you want to know the truth of the matter examine the clip I posted really closely.
You can't miss it.
The Z-film has not been altered.
Neither have the autopsy pics
Study closely the graphics posted by John Mytton (the usual, excellent standard)
It's all there.

But I have a funny feeling you're just going to get annoyed at having this pointed out to you.
Like most of the other residents in this retirement home for nerds.

[John Mytton]

OMG, the wedding ring once again -- LOL

Oswald dumping wife and kids AND leaving his hard earned cash behind, sure!

ROFL

Vincent T. Bugliosi Jr. (/ˌbuːliˈoʊsi/; August 18, 1934 – June 6, 2015) was an American attorney and New York Times bestselling author. During his eight years in the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office, he successfully prosecuted 105 out of 106 felony jury trials, which included 21 murder convictions. He was best known for prosecuting Charles Manson and other defendants accused of the Tate–LaBianca murders of August 9–10, 1969.

Vs

Otto Beck internet warrior!



JohnM

[Anthony Frank]

There's no need to misinterpret Clint's words, here the man himself explaining exactly what he saw.

So, several decades after the assassination, even after an aging Hill finally goes along with the “official” version that says a bullet entered the back of the head, he still says that the bullet “exploded out the UPPER RIGHT REAR QUADRANT.”

There's no need to misinterpret Clint's words. He wrote the same thing in his Secret Service report, stating, “As I lay over the top of the back seat, I noticed a portion of the President’s head on the right rear side was missing and he was bleeding profusely. Part of his brain was gone. I saw a part of his skull with hair on it lying in the seat.”

And he told the Warren Commission the same thing, “The second noise that I heard had removed a portion of the President’s head,” and he reiterated what was in his report, “The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car.”

Hill told the Warren Commission that the only wound he could see was “the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.”

Parkland Hospital doctors and nurses saw the same thing (see my first post for their hospital reports and testimony). And people at the autopsy saw it (again, see my first post).

It’s all in my book. Click the link.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07V9JT65Y

[John Iacoletti]

Oh really? Just a small part of my work which was selected from hours of uploaded videos is below and just in the first few minutes of this video, I have edited together images with way over 10 layers including a number of elements independently moving in what would have been called a travelling matte

That's a lot of effort for a shameless propaganda piece.

[Anthony Frank]

GUNN: Did you see any wounds on the back of his head?
REED: No.
............
GUNN: Did you see any wounds at all on his head?
REED: Yes, I did.
GUNN: Could you describe where those wounds were?
REED: It was in the temporal parietal region, right side. I could - It was large enough that I could probably put four fingers into it.

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=794#relPageId=7

So, more than nineteen years after telling the House Select Committee on Assassinations that President Kennedy’s head wound was “very large and located in the right hemisphere in the occipital region,” Reed changed his story to go along with the official version.

Relocating the head wound was not the only thing that Reed changed.

Reed also told the ARRB that he did not see any wounds on JFK other than the throat wound and the now-relocated head wound. Reed told the HSCA that “the third wound was situated in the back.”

Reed changed his story nineteen years after acknowledging that President Kennedy’s head wound was “very large and located in the right hemisphere in the occipital region.” Reed was just one of a multitude of witnesses who saw the gaping wound at the back of President Kennedy's head on November 22, 1963.

And I am not surprised that Reed changed his story in 1997. When he acknowledged back in 1978 that the head wound was “very large and located in the right hemisphere in the occipital region,” Reed also “mentioned that he basically believed the Warren Commission adequately covered the area.”

So, in 1997, Reed says, “Yeah, sure. A wound in the temporal parietal region, right side, and a throat wound. There were no other wounds that I saw. The Warren Commission was right. Now leave me alone.”

Anyone who wants the well-documented facts on who killed President Kennedy and why needs to read my book.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07V9JT65Y