JFK Was Shot From The Front

[Anthony Frank]

I will take the multitude of eyewitness descriptions (see my first post) over fabricated autopsy photos and the pathologists cover up any day.

[Bill Chapman]

Jackie: 'Top, behind the forehead'

You know; the witness who had the best seat in the house.

[John Mytton]

So, Doctors Jones and Perry, who “took over the primary management” in the emergency room where one of their objectives was to “assess how bad his head injury was,” could not actually see “what appeared to be an exit wound in the posterior portion of the skull.”

Doctors Jones and Perry could not actually see “a large wound of the right posterior cranium,” and they could not see that President Kennedy had “a large avulsive wound on the right posterior cranium.”

Seeing as how Doctors Jones and Perry “took over the primary management” in the emergency room and they were supposed to “assess how bad his head injury was,” they must have been grossly incompetent to ignore a massive opening on the side of the head.

The grossly incompetent doctors lied about the wound at the back of the head. They were clearly part of the conspiracy to say that he was shot from the front.

Parkland Nurse Pat Hutton was asked to “place a pressure dressing on the head wound,” but it “was of no use, however, because of the massive opening on the back of the head.” She obviously saw "the very back of the head," but she was clearly lying because the wound was actually on the side of the head.

Hutton was clearly part of the conspiracy to say that he was shot from the front.

Dr. Charles Carrico clearly lied when he claimed that he observed that “blood and brain were extruding” from a head wound “in the occipital region of the skull.”

Dr. Charles Carrico was clearly part of the conspiracy to say that he was shot from the front. He was not mistaken. He was a “shot from the front” conspirator, who thought he could gloss over what he did by changing his story in 1992.

I could go on, but you have me convinced that there was a massive conspiracy to say that he was shot from the front. And it all started with Secret Service Special Agent Clint Hill, who clearly lied when he wrote in his report that he saw that “a portion of the President’s head on the right rear side was missing and he was bleeding profusely. Part of his brain was gone.”

Now that you have me convinced of the massive conspiracy to say that he was shot from the front, which, of course, is why none of these witnesses said anything about a massive wound on the side of the head, can you tell me why everyone engaged in this conspiracy?

And since Merv Griffin stopped doing his show in 1986 and has since died, I will take this opportunity to plug my book, which is meticulously sourced and rife with documentation from beginning to end and lays out the most shocking information that has ever come forth on corruption in the CIA and the United States government.

Click the link.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07V9JT65Y

Hilarious, when you closely examine the "back of head" eyewitnesses there is absolutely zero corroboration on where they thought they saw the wound, the prosecution would rip these eyewitnesses a new one....



Whereas all the authenticated physical evidence is actually corroborated by a number of Parkland staff along with a stack of civilians.



Btw waving your hand and proclaiming the autopsy evidence as an inconvenient truth is really poor form and does nothing to promote your case, how about proving that the rotating morphs which I posted are based on fake images and tell us how they created two views which can be combined into mathematically perfect stereoscopic images?





JohnM

[Ray Mitcham]

The doctors at Parkland were so inefficient they couldn't see the massive wound on the top of the head. They saw a hole the size of an orange a behind the right ear, and even got the fact that they saw cerebellum coming out of the wound wrong. How did these guys get their degrees?

Ignore the facts of the case, and just judge dodgy photos provided by the authorities.

John, please show us how you know the photos are of JFK.

[Bill Chapman]

The doctors at Parkland were so inefficient they couldn't see the massive wound on the top of the head. They saw a hole the size of an orange a behind the right ear, and even got the fact that they saw cerebellum coming out of the wound wrong. How did these guys get their degrees?

Ignore the facts of the case, and just judge dodgy photos provided by the authorities.

John, please show us how you know the photos are of JFK.

The Parkland doctors were not focussed on performing an autopsy. They were primarily focussed on reviving Kennedy. They hadn't even turned him over, FFS.

[Martin Weidmann]

The Parkland doctors were not focussed on performing an autopsy. They were primarily focussed on reviving Kennedy. They hadn't even turned him over, FFS.

But Tom Robinson, one of the embalmers also saw the massive hole in the back of the head close up. In fact he was involved in filling it up with rubber. So, tell us why what he saw wasn't there in reality?

[Dan O'meara]

It is clear in the clip below that, not only is the initial movement of JFK's head forward at the moment of impact, but the resultant wound is a massive 'crater' in the top of his head (as per the images posted by John Mytton.)



The Z-film and the autopsy pics are in perfect accord. Arguing that all these images were altered or that testimony takes precedent over the actual images of the injury is just Tinfoil nonsense.