DPD Tapes and a 6 Minute Discrepancy

[Mitch Todd]

What I "refrain from objecting to" tells you nothing about what "standard" I'm applying to anything.  You just made that up by making an assumption -- much like you do when citing "evidence" in this case.

I made an observation, not an assumption. Maybe you confuse those words.

Again, we see what you take issue with, and what you do not. Comparing the two gives us a great deal of insight into the standards you rely on, no matter what you might want to believe. The standards you actually use, rather than the ones you might think you use.

In light of this, accusing me of "making it up" changes nothing except for other people's opinions of you. 

[John Iacoletti]

Not according to Bugliosi, you know the guy who successfully prosecuted 105 out of 106 felony jury trials.

False appeal to authority.  Logical fallacy.

[John Iacoletti]

Again, we see what you take issue with, and what you do not. Comparing the two gives us a great deal of insight into the standards you rely on, no matter what you might want to believe. The standards you actually use, rather than the ones you might think you use.

Who's "us"?

On the other hand, you've demonstrated to "us" what your observations are worth.

[Mitch Todd]

Who's "us"?

It's "who's 'we'" not "who's 'us.'" You had one word to quote, only one, and you couldn't even get it right.  Which leads straight into your next line: ​

Jabs aside, "we" are all the people who've noted over the years that your "I'm jes' an honest sceptic" act is belied by it's one-sided nature. My stated observation and Jeey 's and Mytton's quacks-like-a-duck cartoon takes are the latest examples.

On the other hand, you've demonstrated to 'us' what your observations are worth.

They're worth more than all the sour grapes in your arsenal.

[John Mytton]

It's "who's 'we'" not "who's 'us.'" You had one word to quote, only one, and you couldn't even get it right.  Which leads straight into your next line: ​

Jabs aside, "we" are all the people who've noted over the years that your "I'm jes' an honest sceptic" act is belied by it's one-sided nature. My stated observation and Jeey 's and Mytton's quacks-like-a-duck cartoon takes are the latest examples.
They're worth more than all the sour grapes in your arsenal.

Iacoletti's, hey man I'm just a neutral observer and therefore I must be taken seriously schtick was undone with his very first post and thousands of posts later, for reasons known only to himself, he still persists with this delusion. As you have pointed out, the constant blatant contradictions of his accusations is absurd, for example the Police are all corrupt except when they're not?

And as for Iacoletti calling my Visual Educational Aids, a cartoon, or squiggly lines or coloured blobs or whatever without any scientific basis for his objection is equally absurd, but considering he believes that the Zapruder film "seemed" to be going backwards, well, I take any objection of his with a grain of salt.

It's also quite ironic that he splashes around "LOL" with such gay abandon when he actually comes across as a very bitter and disturbed man, but hey whatever, it's a free country and I'll defend his right to say whatever he likes because in the end every time he opens his mouth he's only shredding his own credibility and doing himself a massive disservice.

Btw, the way "Iacoletti's" attempts to discredit a poster by putting a members name's in "quotation marks" is also baffling, not one member here has ever proved that they are who they say they are, and especially not to Iacoletti's unrealistic high standard of proof but again it is what it is, but it does remind me of a time when he tried to convince me that CT members here used their real names but when I produced a post of Caprio's where he admitted to using an alias and I asked Weidmann who as predicted was supporting Iacoletti, to produce some ID, which I explained could have any personal info redacted, to prove Weidmann's name was actually Weidmann and lo and behold the usual chorus of crickets was his response and thereafter Iacoletti withdrew his argument, put his tail between his legs and we never heard squat again.

[Martin Weidmann]

Iacoletti's, hey man I'm just a neutral observer and therefore I must be taken seriously schtick was undone with his very first post and thousands of posts later, for reasons known only to himself, he still persists with this delusion. As you have pointed out, the constant blatant contradictions of his accusations is absurd, for example the Police are all corrupt except when they're not?

And as for Iacoletti calling my Visual Educational Aids, a cartoon, or squiggly lines or coloured blobs or whatever without any scientific basis for his objection is equally absurd, but considering he believes that the Zapruder film "seemed" to be going backwards, well, I take any objection of his with a grain of salt.

It's also quite ironic that he splashes around "LOL" with such gay abandon when he actually comes across as a very bitter and disturbed man, but hey whatever, it's a free country and I'll defend his right to say whatever he likes because in the end every time he opens his mouth he's only shredding his own credibility and doing himself a massive disservice.

Btw, the way "Iacoletti's" attempts to discredit a poster by putting a members name's in "quotation marks" is also baffling, not one member here has ever proved that they are who they say they are, and especially not to Iacoletti's unrealistic high standard of proof but again it is what it is, but it does remind me of a time when he tried to convince me that CT members here used their real names but when I produced a post of Caprio's where he admitted to using an alias and I asked Weidmann who as predicted was supporting Iacoletti, to produce some ID, which I explained could have any personal info redacted, to prove Weidmann's name was actually Weidmann and lo and behold the usual chorus of crickets was his response and thereafter Iacoletti withdrew his argument, put his tail between his legs and we never heard squat again.

I asked Weidmann who as predicted was supporting Iacoletti, to produce some ID, which I explained could have any personal info redacted, to prove Weidmann's name was actually Weidmann and lo and behold the usual chorus of crickets was his response 

You just can't help yourself, can't you? Lying is your first, second and third nature. You never asked me anything of the kind, and in fact when I contacted to you to set up a meeting, during my trip to Australia, a couple of years ago, you ran as fast as you could, Mr. "John Mytton".

[John Mytton]

I asked Weidmann who as predicted was supporting Iacoletti, to produce some ID, which I explained could have any personal info redacted, to prove Weidmann's name was actually Weidmann and lo and behold the usual chorus of crickets was his response 

You just can't help yourself, can't you? Lying is your first, second and third nature. You never asked me anything of the kind, and in fact when I contacted to you to set up a meeting, during my trip to Australia, a couple of years ago, you ran as fast as you could, Mr. "John Mytton".

Awesome, it's no secret that Bill Brown and I busted you for changing your name from Roger Collins and I have patiently waited and repeatedly asked for you to prove that your name is Martin Weidmann and now's your chance to finally provide proof that your name is actually Martin Weidmann, well, what are you waiting for?

I found one of the threads where Iacoletti who's absolutely obsessed with the use of "aliases", claimed that some members including LNers used their real names and said that Rob used his real name and after I produced the following screenshot, Iacoletti tried to insert the word "and" in a desperate grammar defying attempt to support his dishonesty. I also asked Walt who added himself into one of  the debates to provide ID using the same above criteria that I asked you, and he also didn't comply.


https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,1276.270.html

Btw I'm sure you've got proof to back your claim that you were even in Australia?

JohnM