Youtube Interview I Did, Tippit Case

[Martin Weidmann]

Now there's a path of least resistance if I ever saw one.
What are you running from, Martin?

Are you under the misguided impression that you said anything of significance in the post I responded to?

Calling it "reality" was the funniest part.

No speculation needed

BOOYAH

If no speculation is needed, then why are you and your ilk constantly speculating and making wild assumptions?

[Bill Chapman]

Are you under the misguided impression that you said anything of significance in the post I responded to?

Calling it "reality" was the funniest part.

If no speculation is needed, then why are you and your ilk constantly speculating and making wild assumptions?

Pretty sure a number of witnesses @Tippit and nearby weren't speculating or making wild assumptions.


BILL CHAPMAN

[Martin Weidmann]

Pretty sure a number of witnesses @Tippit and nearby weren't speculating or making wild assumptions.


BILL CHAPMAN

And I'm pretty sure that you are not completely sure. No what?

[Bill Chapman]

And I'm pretty sure that you are not completely sure. No what?

I'm completely sure that you've missed the sarcasm in my use of 'pretty sure'. And I'm completely sure that #2 in the lineup (aka Lee Harvey Oswald ) was fingered by Helen Markham as the one she saw killing the officer. And I'm completely sure a few good men in and around the Tippit scene also fingered Oswald as the #2 man in the lineup.

[Martin Weidmann]

I'm completely sure that you've missed the sarcasm in my use of 'pretty sure'. And I'm completely sure that #2 in the lineup (aka Lee Harvey Oswald ) was fingered by Helen Markham as the one she saw killing the officer. And I'm completely sure a few good men in and around the Tippit scene also fingered Oswald as the #2 man in the lineup.

Good for you that you are completely sure. So now you can drop the "I'm pretty sure" crap.

Just consider this; I'm beyond sure that, even if I did not witness the actual crime, if I were placed in front of a 4 man line up like that I would pick Oswald as the most likely one as well.

Too bad that none of the line up witnesses were ever questioned by a defense lawyer because it is beyond a shadow of a doubt (IMO) that their identifications would have been destroyed on the stand.

[Bill Chapman]

Good for you that you are completely sure. So now you can drop the "I'm pretty sure" crap.

Just consider this; I'm beyond sure that, even if I did not witness the actual crime, if I were placed in front of a 4 man line up like that I would pick Oswald as the most likely one as well.

Too bad that none of the line up witnesses were ever questioned by a defense lawyer because it is beyond a shadow of a doubt (IMO) that their identifications would have been destroyed on the stand.

'So now you can drop the "I'm pretty sure" crap.'
Who are you to tell me to drop anything? And just who testified that Oswald was the 'most likely one' btw?


BILL CHAPMAN

[Martin Weidmann]

'So now you can drop the "I'm pretty sure" crap.'
WhoTF are you to tell me to drop anything? And just who testified that Oswald was the 'most likely one' btw?


BILL CHAPMAN

WhoTF are you to tell me to drop anything?

Did you say something, hypocrite?

Now feel free to bugger off if you must.