Youtube Interview I Did, Tippit Case

[Bill Brown]

11. He (Bill) said Oswald “pretended to look at shoes”, but Brewer said no such thing.

I didn't say that Brewer said that Oswald pretended to look at shoes.  I simply said that Oswald pretended to look at shoes.

What difference does it make, anyway?

Anyone else see just how lame this whole thing is?

This does not belong on any list of "errors".

[Bill Brown]

14. He (Bill) says Burt “failed to make a positive identification of Oswald” to the FBI—but the FBI never asked him such a question!

How does the fact the FBI didn't ask Burt "such a question" somehow prove my statement that Burt failed to make a positive identification of Oswald to be an "error"?

Burt never positively identified Oswald as the killer.  I said the same.  Where is my "error"?

[Bill Brown]

15. Bill incorrectly says first generation researcher Shirley Martin was from Wisconsin—she was from Oklahoma.

Really?  LOL

Below is what I actually said:

"Basically I think she was a housewife that came down from Wisconsin or something like that."

In the interview, I am being very clear that I have no idea where she was from. This guy's desperation to list what he believes are mistakes and errors has caused him to be much less than honest about the things I said in the interview. Not to mention, it has nothing to do with anything.

This does not belong on any list of "errors".

This whole thing is kinda ridiculous.  I'm done with it.

[Richard Smith]

Its difficult to see how an FBI agent would mix up 2 feet vs 3 feet especially in regard to something as critical as the length of the bag that contained the rifle.

These are the same contrarian nuts who believe that a date on a meaningless form could not be incorrect but suggest here that the FBI "misheard" a witness on an important issue.   

[Richard Smith]

15. Bill incorrectly says first generation researcher Shirley Martin was from Wisconsin—she was from Oklahoma.

Really?  LOL

Below is what I actually said:

"Basically I think she was a housewife that came down from Wisconsin or something like that."

In the interview, I am being very clear that I have no idea where she was from. This guy's desperation to list what he believes are mistakes and errors has caused him to be much less than honest about the things I said in the interview. Not to mention, it has nothing to do with anything.

This does not belong on any list of "errors".

This whole thing is kinda ridiculous.  I'm done with it.

The entire JFK case could hang on this point!  LOL.  This list is a great example of CTer nuts ignoring the evidence and taking the discussion down the rabbit hole.   It is sad and pathetic to see posters like Martin/Roger trying to be relevant.

[Gerry Down]

JFK Truth Be Told

I didn't realize Truth Be Told was such a well-established group. I had seen the below video some time back but didn't realize it was the Truth Be Told group. Who are the people in the video? Are they significant in the JFK research community? One is Bill Brown a Tippit expert and Fred Litwin who has written two books on the case. Who are the other people, have they done anything significant in the JFK case?

[Bill Brown]

The entire JFK case could hang on this point!  LOL.  This list is a great example of CTer nuts ignoring the evidence and taking the discussion down the rabbit hole.   It is sad and pathetic to see posters like Martin/Roger trying to be relevant.

How do you picture a "debate" going between myself and Martin/Roger?

I can see it now...

Bill:  "The shells found at the Tippit scene were linked, through ballistics, to Oswald's revolver to the exclusion of every other weapon in the world."

Then, as I begin to explain how ballistic testing works, Martin/Roger chimes in with this gem....

Martin/Roger:  "Oswald's revolver  LOL"