Youtube Interview I Did, Tippit Case

[Martin Weidmann]

So Oswald left the rooming house zipping up "a vest, cardigan or sweater"  Got it.

Sorry, but you fail my litmus test.  You aren't really interested in the truth; you just wanna play games.

So you can't prove that Oswald left the rooming house wearing a jacket and/or that he ditched it somewhere? It's duly noted!

So Oswald left the rooming house zipping up "a vest, cardigan or sweater"  Got it.

Not what I said.... Why do you need to misrepresent what I said? Again; Roberts may well have believed that Oswald left the house wearing or zipping up a jacket, but that doesn't automatically mean that is what happened.

Sorry, but you fail my litmus test.  You aren't really interested in the truth; you just wanna play games.

I've said this before; Your litmus test is a very simple one; anyone who agrees with you passes the test and anyone who doesn't, does not.

I'm not the one who is playing games, nor am I the one who is ignoring evidence.

The biggest difference between you and me is that you believe that you know what the truth actually is and I don't. I'm merely trying to find out for myself what the truth is. Unlike you, I have no agenda. Unlike you, I couldn't care less if Oswald was guilty or innocent and/or part of a conspiracy or not. You are the fanatical zealot who thinks that whatever he believes is the truth. There is nothing reasonable about your opinions. You argue from behind a solidly closed door that will never be opened. The irony is that all I am asking from you and your ilk is to provide the conclusive evidence of Oswald's guilt and it turns out you can't.

[Richard Smith]

So you can't prove that Oswald left the rooming house wearing a jacket and/or that he ditched it somewhere? It's duly noted!

So Oswald left the rooming house zipping up "a vest, cardigan or sweater"  Got it.

Not what I said.... Why do you need to misrepresent what I said? Again; Roberts may well have believed that Oswald left the house wearing or zipping up a jacket, but that doesn't automatically mean that is what happened.

Sorry, but you fail my litmus test.  You aren't really interested in the truth; you just wanna play games.

I've said this before; Your litmus test is a very simple one; anyone who agrees with you passes the test and anyone who doesn't, does not.

I'm not the one who is playing games, nor am I the one who is ignoring evidence.

The biggest difference between you and me is that you believe that you know what the truth actually is and I don't. I'm merely trying to find out for myself what the truth is. Unlike you, I have no agenda. Unlike you, I couldn't care less if Oswald was guilty or innocent and/or part of a conspiracy or not. You are the fanatical zealot who thinks that whatever he believes is the truth. There is nothing reasonable about your opinions. You argue from behind a solidly closed door that will never be opened. The irony is that all I am asking from you and your ilk is to provide the conclusive evidence of Oswald's guilt and it turns out you can't.

The biggest difference between you and Bill is that you are a nut.  You have no agenda?  LOL.  You are delusional.  Never once I have seen you question any possible evidence that lends itself to Oswald's innocence, but in every single instance you question the evidence of his guilt.  No matter how well documented.   How about you apply your standard of proof to Frazier's description of how Oswald carried his package?  Something you appear to accept as a fact.  Who "corroborated" Frazier's description of how Oswald carried his bag?

[Martin Weidmann]

The biggest difference between you and Bill is that you are a nut.  You have no agenda?  LOL.  You are delusional.  Never once I have seen you question any possible evidence that lends itself to Oswald's innocence, but in every single instance you question the evidence of his guilt.  No matter how well documented.   How about you apply your standard of proof to Frazier's description of how Oswald carried his package?  Something you appear to accept as a fact.  Who "corroborated" Frazier's description of how Oswald carried his bag?

And there is the other zealot jumping in like a monkey doing tricks.... 

Never once I have seen you question any possible evidence that lends itself to Oswald's innocence, but in every single instance you question the evidence of his guilt.

Which only tells me that you haven't been paying attention.

How about you apply your standard of proof to Frazier's description of how Oswald carried his package?  Something you appear to accept as a fact.  Who "corroborated" Frazier's description of how Oswald carried his bag?

There it is again, another loaded question. Nobody mentioned "how Oswald carried his bag". Frazier, on day 1, denied, while being polygraphed, that the bag found at the TSBD wasn't the one he had seen Oswald carry and his sister backed him up.

[Gerry Down]

Frazier, on day 1, denied, while being polygraphed, that the bag found at the TSBD wasn't the one he had seen Oswald carry and his sister backed him up.

Didn't Linnie Mae Randle say in her first FBI interview that the package was 3 feet long. And only later magically changed her testimony to it being 27 inches to match Fraziers testimony exactly. The fact that Frazier and Linnie were living together might have influenced her later account of shortening the package to 27 inches.

[Richard Smith]

And there is the other zealot jumping in like a monkey doing tricks.... 

Never once I have seen you question any possible evidence that lends itself to Oswald's innocence, but in every single instance you question the evidence of his guilt.

Which only tells me that you haven't been paying attention.

How about you apply your standard of proof to Frazier's description of how Oswald carried his package?  Something you appear to accept as a fact.  Who "corroborated" Frazier's description of how Oswald carried his bag?

There it is again, another loaded question. Nobody mentioned "how Oswald carried his bag". Frazier, on day 1, denied, while being polygraphed, that the bag found at the TSBD wasn't the one he had seen Oswald carry and his sister backed him up.

You have gone on and on and on about how Oswald carried the bag to prove that it could not be long enough to have contained the rifle.  Did anyone "corroborate" Frazier's description that you have cited hundreds of times as an absolute fact?

[Martin Weidmann]

You have gone on and on and on about how Oswald carried the bag to prove that it could not be long enough to have contained the rifle.  Did anyone "corroborate" Frazier's description that you have cited hundreds of times as an absolute fact?

Did anyone "corroborate" Frazier's description that you have cited hundreds of times as an absolute fact?

Did anyone "corroborate" the way Dan Rather carried the package, as you have claimed as an absolute fact?

Corroboration for Frazier's description comes from his sister who saw Oswald carry the package, holding the top in his hand and not touching the ground at the other end. The dimensions are similar and if the package had been longer, as in the Dan Rather video, Randle would have seen it touch the ground, which of course she didn't.

[Richard Smith]

Did anyone "corroborate" Frazier's description that you have cited hundreds of times as an absolute fact?

Did anyone "corroborate" the way Dan Rather carried the package, as you have claimed as an absolute fact?

Corroboration for Frazier's description comes from his sister who saw Oswald carry the package, holding the top in his hand and not touching the ground at the other end. The dimensions are similar and if the package had been longer, as in the Dan Rather video, Randle would have seen it touch the ground, which of course she didn't.

Frazier's sister saw Oswald carry the package into the TSBD as Frazier described?