Et tu, Bonnie?

[Bill Chapman]

Didn’t expect you to provide anything that related to the question. Anyone else? Show evidence that the bag taken into evidence was folded in the way Frazier described.

Any witness can describe evidence in a manner that puts himself in the clear.

[Martin Weidmann]

Any witness can describe evidence in a manner that puts himself in the clear.

And any fool who wasn't there himself can claim, without a shred of evidence, that the witness was wrong and that the bag was actually bigger.

[Bill Chapman]

Explain this post

Ask nicely.

[Colin Crow]

Any witness can describe evidence in a manner that puts himself in the clear.

Frazier's day one description of the bag on the back seat is quite specific to the appearance of the bag. Folded at both ends. One over and one under. How does that detail relate to your offering?

[Bill Chapman]

And any fool who wasn't there himself can claim, without a shred of evidence, that the witness was wrong and that the bag was actually bigger.

Any witness with a possible cya motive can manipulate the evidence.

[Martin Weidmann]

Any witness with a possible cya motive can manipulate the evidence.

Just like any investigator who wants to arrive at a predetermined conclusion

[Bill Chapman]

Frazier's day one description of the bag on the back seat is quite specific to the appearance of the bag. Folded at both ends. One over and one under. How does that detail relate to your offering?

There remains some confusion as to whether by 'bottom', Buell meant lengthwise or end

[Colin Crow]

There remains some confusion as to whether by 'bottom', Buell meant lengthwise or end

From the first day affidavit.

"It must have been about 2' long, and the top of the sack was sort of folded up, and the rest of the sack had been kind of folded under."

Whatever your interpretation of his description, can you provide any image of the bag known as CE 142 that could match it?