Et tu, Bonnie?

[Alan J. Ford]

It's not hard to figure out, Dick. There are numerous incidents where witnesses were coerced behind closed doors to change their statements so it dovetailed nicely with the running narrative. It doesn't mean that these people here were "conspirators." You should know better than this, but then I guess this is your way of offering a rebuttal to what Alan is saying here.

What an astute, sensible response there, Mr. Walton, well said sir so indicative of the wisdom of a genuine sage.

[Alan J. Ford]

The eventual "story" that evolved with many key witnesses (but not all) was developed by Belin and Ball in their March 64 visit to Dallas. This included the troubling conflicting statements of Williams, Jarman and Norman. They
developed the sequence of events that would play out for the various testimonies. Some problematic witnesses like Dougherty could never be resolved (ref Eisenberg memo). These guys all testified just days after the "re-enactments" were decided upon, four months after the real events. Many original statements vary considerably from the final versions.

A fair assessment there, Mr. Crow, no great surprise considering the exemplary researcher making the statement.

[Alan J. Ford]

The reason he left work shortly after the assassination

There are at least three different accounts of him leaving....

So, how do you know when he actually left the TSBD?

A response so indicative of more exemplary evidence being shared here to hold the "official" account accountable to much closer examination. Well, said there, Mr. Weidmann, bravo!

[Alan J. Ford]

Oswald was dead within three days of the crime. As I said Ball and Belin spent time in Dallas in March 64 trying to sort out the reconstruction of Oswald's movements with the underlying presumption that he was the assassin. They did reconstructions of the staircase and lunchroom encounter, shell casings dropping etc. but not all witnesses and events were used. Inconvenient events were omitted, particularly those of Dougherty, Adams, Lovelady and Shelley.

So worthy of a rousing round of applaud. Hear! hear!

[Alan J. Ford]

He didn't flee the scene, he just left as did (at least) 18 or 19 others.

Oswald's rifle lol. Explain why his fingerprints weren't on the shell casings, nor on the clip, nor on the bolt or trigger. Explain how Oswald or anyone else could have fired an accurate shot using the telescopic sight which was broken, needed shims to stabilize (not found or present when the rifle was discovered)  and after the rifle was re-assembled using a dime.

Explain why the rifle supposedly ordered by Oswald is a different one than the rifle found on the sixth floor and now located at the NARA.

The bullets recovered from officer Tippit's body couldn't be matched to the barrel of "Oswald's revolver."

There is no "stone cold case" against Oswald. Not a single prosecutorial fact is undisputed, and with good reason. You probably think a man can not be framed for murder or any other crime. Think again bubba, it happens.

Cheers!, Mr. van de Wiel, just like a sharp lawyer to possess keen, critical-thinking skills.

[Alan J. Ford]

Buell Frazier claimed, some years ago, that he was still standing on the stairs of the TSBD when, about 15 minutes after the shooting, he saw Oswald coming down North Houston street and going down Elm. He figured Oswald had left the building at the back and was going to get lunch.

Interesting @ 15 minutes post-assassination time. Thanks for sharing this gem. So much for the phantom encounter at 10th & Patton across town. The wrongly accused did not shoot anybody. Anybody.

[Alan J. Ford]

Who claimed such a thing, Mr Smith?

A very interesting question there, Mr. Ford, no great surprise considering the source....All ears here Mr. Smith as we await your source. Please spare us that it was one of the two lying rooftop tandem. A legitimate source void of more horse manure from the lying rooftop tandem should suffice.