Et tu, Bonnie?

[Jerry Freeman]

   You have actually bolstered the WC Report.  Congrats.

Did not.

Oswald's prints were on the rifle.

Were not.

[Richard Smith]

Did not. Were not.

Fantastic rebuttal and use of evidence.  Are you still claiming that a latch kept Baker and Truly from going to the roof and they lied about that for some inexplicable reason?

[Alan Ford]

So you are running away from the claim that a latch on the roof door somehow precluded Baker and Truly from going up there.

Who claimed such a thing, Mr Smith?

[John Iacoletti]

Yes, Oswald was totally innocent. The reason he left work shortly after the assassination and went to him rooming house was because he wanted to retrieve his revolver and hunt down the dirty bastards who killed JFK.

Like there's any evidence that he "retrieved his revolver" at the rooming house.  WC apologists just love to state assumptions as facts.

He even carried extra bullets in case there were more than a couple of assassins.

You mean those "extra bullets" that were "found" in his pocket hours after he was arrested?

[John Iacoletti]

Nothing "evolved" if by that you mean there was a frame up of Oswald.  A few details may have been left out or omitted from the initial statements as expected.  Over time there was a more in depth investigation.  When all was said and done Oswald's rifle was found on the 6th floor.  Fired bullet casings from his rifle were found by the SN window.  He fled the scene and murdered a police officer.   It's a stone cold case against Oswald.  To suggest that a latch on a door to the roof precludes Baker and Truly from going there after the assassination is somehow evidence of a conspiracy is laughable.

Speaking of laughable...

"Oswald's rifle".  LOL
"fled the scene". LOL
"murdered a police officer". LOL

[John Iacoletti]

Fantastic rebuttal and use of evidence.

Hitchens' razor:  "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence".

[Richard Smith]

Who claimed such a thing, Mr Smith?

So you underline the fact that someone claimed the door to the roof was locked and claimed Baker and Truly were liars but you were not suggesting they lied about going to the roof?  This gets better and better.  Maybe explain your point then.  Why so cryptic?