The comparison between the conclusion that Oswald carried his rifle in the bag and Alan's baseless curtain rod theory is absurd. To suggest those two events are both the result of "speculation" is laughable. A rifle was found in the TSBD. There is no doubt of that fact. It was filmed. It is a documented fact that the rifle was found on the 6th floor. That rifle had a specific serial number that confirms it is the same rifle sent to Oswald's PO box. Oswald is pictured holding a rifle that can't be accounted for in any other way. Oswald's prints are on the rifle discovered on the 6th floor. Oswald made an unscheduled visit to the location where the rifle was kept on the night before the assassination. He carried a long bag to work the next morning that can't be accounted for in any other way. His rifle is no longer in the Paine's garage when the DPD search it later that day. A long bag is found next to the SN from which shots were fired. It has Oswald's prints on it. It can't be accounted for in any other way at that location except to contain the rifle. No other long bag is ever found. Oswald's rifle can't be accounted for in any other way except as the one found in the TSBD. He lies about ever even owning a rifle and provides no explanation for how his rifle came to be there.
In contrast, there are no such facts that support the discovery of any curtain rods at the TSBD as Alan suggests. There are no photos of any such curtain rods being found there. No witness ever came forward to confirm any such curtain rods were ever found. In fact, Truly confirmed in Sept. '64 that no curtain rods had ever been found at the TSBD. No curtain rods are missing from Paine's garage. Oswald did not ask Ruth Paine or Marina for any curtain rods. Oswald himself denies carrying any curtain rods even though that would have been exculpatory to him. Oswald's prints are not found on any curtain rods. It is completely baseless in every respect in complete contrast to the situation with the rifle.
The comparison between the conclusion that Oswald carried his rifle in the bag and Alan's baseless curtain rod theory is absurd. To suggest those two events are both the result of "speculation" is laughable. A rifle was found in the TSBD. There is no doubt of that fact. It was filmed. It is a documented fact that the rifle was found on the 6th floor. Once again, you're missing the point. The comparision was about a broken down MC rifle being concealed in the bag Oswald carried. No matter how much spin you put on it, you have not a shred of evidence there ever was a broken rifle of any kind in the bag Oswald carried, nor have you a shred of evidence that the bag found at the TSBD was the same bag Oswald carried.
That rifle had a specific serial number that confirms it is the same rifle sent to Oswald's PO box. Oswald is pictured holding a rifle that can't be accounted for in any other way. Oswald's prints are on the rifle discovered on the 6th floor. Oswald made an unscheduled visit to the location where the rifle was kept on the night before the assassination.All this is part of a narrative for which there isn't a shred of evidence. You can not present any evidence that shows that;
- any rifle was sent to Oswald's PO box.
- the serial number handwritten on an internal documents of Klein's was actually written on it prior to the assassination
- that the rifle Oswald is holding in the BY pictures is actually the same one found at the TSBD or that he owned it
- Oswald's print (not prints!) was found on the MC rifle. All you have is an evidence card with his print on it, produced by Day a week after the assissination.
- Oswald kept a rifle in Ruth Paine's garage.
He carried a long bag to work the next morning that can't be accounted for in any other way. His rifle is no longer in the Paine's garage when the DPD search it later that day. A long bag is found next to the SN from which shots were fired. It has Oswald's prints on it. It can't be accounted for in any other way at that location except to contain the rifle. No other long bag is ever found. Oswald's rifle can't be accounted for in any other way except as the one found in the TSBD. He lies about ever even owning a rifle and provides no explanation for how his rifle came to be there.More BS.. the mere fact that you can not account for some things in any other way doesn't mean any of what you have written is actually true.
In short, you are using a concocted narrative based on very little physical evidence to justify the conclusion that Oswald must have carried the MC rifle to work on Friday morning and are calling it "a logical inference".
In contrast, there are no such facts that support the discovery of any curtain rods at the TSBD as Alan suggests. There is no contrast. You are calling all sorts of speculative assumptions "facts" which they clearly are not!
There are no photos of any such curtain rods being found there. No witness ever came forward to confirm any such curtain rods were ever found. In fact, Truly confirmed in Sept. '64 that no curtain rods had ever been found at the TSBD. No curtain rods are missing from Paine's garage. Oswald did not ask Ruth Paine or Marina for any curtain rods. That's a fallacy. The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
It is completely baseless in every respect in complete contrast to the situation with the rifle. Only in your biased mind.
Alan is raising a legitmate question. The DPD document shows that on 15 March 1964, Secret Service Agent Howlett submitted two curtain rods to the DPD Identification Department, for fingerprint testing. The document, included in the evidence list of the Warren Report, also shows that Howlett did not collect those rods again until 24 March 1964, which means they were at the DPD between 15 and 24 March 1964. As Ruth Paine's testimony on 23 March 1964 shows that Howlett took two curtain rods from a shelf in Ruth's garage, it is perfectly valid to ask how this can be, when the curtain rods marked 275 and 276 were at the DPD.
Rather than being your usual contrarian self, why don't you try to provide us with an explanation, other that the silly "they got the dates wrong" crap?