We agree that you made several baseless and stupid explanations for Oswald's "curtain rods." Why keep going on about the stupidity of your own suggestions?
No, your strawman arguments are the things that are stupid.
Oswald's rifle was found in the TSBD.
"Oswald's rifle". LOL.
That means it got there.
Brilliant.
Oswald worked in that building.
Also brilliant.
Oswald had access to the rifle.
Bzzzt. Assumes facts not in evidence.
A long, homemade bag with Oswald's prints was found next to fired bullet casings from his rifle.
Bzzzt. You don't know where this was found, or when.
Oswald's rifle was stored at the location from which he came that morning while carrying a long bag.
Bzzzt. You know know where CE139 "was stored" or that it was "Oswald's rifle".
His rifle was gone from that location when the police searched that area later that day.
Bzzzt. You don't know it was ever at "that location".
Oswald lied about owning any rifle despite the confirmation of his wife and photos of him holding a rifle.
Bzzzt. You have no evidence that Oswald owned any rifle at the time of the assassination.
Oswald lied to the police about carrying any such bag.
Bzzzt. According to Fritz's later recollection, he merely "denied that he had brought the long package described by Mr. Frazier and his sister." We don't know what he was specifically asked, nor what the specific answer was. Fritz either relayed this description (accurately or inaccurately), or he possibly even handed CE142 to Oswald and told him that Frazier claimed he carried it in.
All of that adds up to a reasonable conclusion that Oswald carried his rifle in the bag that morning.
No, actually it doesn't. It's based on false premises and conjecture.
