We agree that you made several baseless and stupid explanations for Oswald's "curtain rods." Why keep going on about the stupidity of your own suggestions? Oswald's rifle was found in the TSBD. That means it got there. Oswald worked in that building. Oswald had access to the rifle. A long, homemade bag with Oswald's prints was found next to fired bullet casings from his rifle. There is no work-related explanation for that bags presence in the TSBD. Oswald's rifle was stored at the location from which he came that morning while carrying a long bag. His rifle was gone from that location when the police searched that area later that day. Oswald lied about owning any rifle despite the confirmation of his wife and photos of him holding a rifle. He had no explanation for the presence of his rifle in that building. Oswald lied to the police about carrying any such bag. All of that adds up to a reasonable conclusion that Oswald carried his rifle in the bag that morning. There is no credible basis to dispute that conclusion. All the facts and logical inferences support that conclusion. It is not necessary to have a time machine or for any witness to have had x-ray vision to confirm the contents of a bag as you stupidly suggest in a desperate attempt once again to apply an impossible standard of proof to any fact that you do not wish to acknowledge.
Why don't you make a song of this standard text, filled with half truths, assumptions and misrepresentations?
We agree that you made several baseless and stupid explanations for Oswald's "curtain rods." Why keep going on about the stupidity of your own suggestions? Stop making up stuff and blatantly showing off your ignorance.
All I have done is show Ross Lidell that speculation isn't getting him anywhere, but that went straight over your head.
All of that adds up to a reasonable conclusion that Oswald carried his rifle in the bag that morning. There is no credible basis to dispute that conclusion. All the facts and logical inferences support that conclusion. All this is perfectly true, if...(and that's a big if) you assume first that Oswald is guilty and that everything else you said was true, factual and proven. Sadly it isn't, because as usual, you are working backwards and making stuff up as you go along;
A rifle was found at the TSBD, which I, "Richard Smith", believe belongs to Oswald, so Oswald must be the killer and he must have brought in the rifle and used the paper bag found at the TSBD to do it. Instead of providing us with conclusive evidence for those claims, you provide us with massive speculations based on just one piece of physical evidence, being the rifle. And even that can only be tentatively linked to Oswald.
Your house of cards lacks foundation!
Btw, nice pivot away from your massive screw up! But don't worry, I won't press the point any further as I would be wasting my time. Being the fanatical Trump supporter you are tells us clearly that it's completely impossible to have any kind of normal and rational conversation with you. The biggest fool is the one who thinks he knows everything better than all others and that applies to you beyond question.
