As usual you can't follow along. That is the bag your contrarian brother suggests is just ordinary "paper for wrapping books." Suggesting it was not suspicious and could have been used for some work-related purpose. HA HA HA. Do you believe that a three foot plus long bag taped like that was being used to wrap books? Have you seen pictures of any similar looking bags in the TSBD? Did any other TSBD employee ever provide an explanation for that bag or suggested it was the type of bag that they used in the course of their business? Wow. It is a singular bag. It is found next to the SN. It has Oswald's prints on it. No one else who worked there ever said to the authorities that the bag they believed contained the rifle used to assassinate the president was just ordinary paper for wrapping books. It is absurd to suggest that this bag was used for any purpose except to carry the rifle.
Repeating the same crap over and over again isn't going to yield a different response.
It is absurd to suggest that this bag was used for any purpose except to carry the rifle.It is absurd to suggest that this bag was used to carry the rifle, when you haven't got a shred of evidence for it. Your opinions aren't evidence.
Have you figured out already who the other prints found on the bag belong to?
