Then went inside with the curtain rods

[John Iacoletti]

The bag was also found. It had Oswald's prints on it.  No one in over 50 years who worked at the TSBD ever explained or claimed ownership of the bag the authorities claimed Oswald used to carry his rifle.  It is found just next to the SN.

No.  A bag that Frazier said was not the same package was claimed to have been found next to the alleged SN, but it doesn't appear in any crime scene photos, the first 5 or 6 deputies on the scene don't remember seeing it, and there are contradictory stories from the people who found it as to when it was found, where it was found, and how it was folded.

Besides, there isn't even any evidence of a rifle ever having been in that bag either.

And EVEN if they thought there was any doubt about whether Oswald used his bag to carry the rifle, his rifle is in the TSBD!

"His rifle".  LOL.

[Bill Chapman]

If you're going to claim that Oswald brought a broken-down rifle with a 34.8-inch long stock in the bag that Frazier saw that morning, then it is contingent upon you to provide evidence for said claim.

Where exactly do I claim that such a bag was brought into work by Oswald?
 

[John Iacoletti]

>>> What I actually need to prove is nothing, especially not to those who want to treat this discussion platform as their personal court-of-law.

Says the clown who treats this forum as his personal display of colossal ignorance and attempts at being "clever".

Buell was "honest enough" (or stupid enough) to reveal that he didn't want to be remembered forever as the guy who drove Oswald to work.

How do you know what Buell was thinking?  Was this before or after he was threatened by the "other Frazier"?

Yeah, no pause for thought there, huh... no discussion between he and sis to maybe hedge their bets by giving scaled-down measurements.

Evidence that there was a "discussion between he and sis to maybe hedge their bets by giving scaled-down measurements"?

Now, where's the evidence that the MC rifle was (1) ever in Ruth Paine's garage and (2) in the bag the Oswald carried?
>>> The MC that was in the garage and in the bag Oswald carried.

He said "evidence", not just a restatement of the same claim.

[John Iacoletti]

There's no evidence of a lunch bag that needed to be palmed and shoved up into an armpit.

On the contrary.  The evidence is Frazier's description.  What there is actually no evidence of is your fanciful description of a bag sticking up in front of Oswald's face.

[John Iacoletti]

Where exactly do I claim that such a bag was brought into work by Oswald?

It's truly pathetic that you can't even remember what you wrote an hour ago.

>>> The MC that was in the garage and in the bag Oswald carried.

[Alan Ford]

No one else was seen carrying a rifle into the building.

Just a hunch here, Mr Smith, but I'm thinking that if someone involved in the assassination plot wished to get a rifle into the building they might think to put it in something first so that folks wouldn't notice them getting a rifle into the building.

There is thus absolutely no difficulty in explaining how a rifle might have been gotten into the building.........

[Bill Chapman]

On the contrary.  The evidence is Frazier's description.  What there is actually no evidence of is your fanciful description of a bag sticking up in front of Oswald's face.

In other words, stop investigating the ways that the bag can be manipulated to challenge what Buell concludes was under the armpit solely because he saw nothing above the shoulders.

[Alan Ford]

In other words, stop investigating the ways that the bag can be manipulated to challenge what Buell concludes was under the armpit solely because he saw nothing above the shoulders.

This sentence is a masterpiece of nonsense. Bravo, Mr Chapman!