Then went inside with the curtain rods

[Martin Weidmann]

So.............. your explanation for the dates & information on this document is?

He hasn't got one, Alan.

Facts are not Richard's thing. He much rather just make up some wacky tale and subsequent ridicule it.
Asking Richard for an answer is the same as asking Oswald for a loan.

[Alan Ford]

Strawman "Smith" doesn't explain things.  He laughs maniacally and mutters incoherent rambles to himself.

And then runs away. Every time.

[Richard Smith]

And then runs away. Every time.

HA HA HA. 

[Alan Ford]

He hasn't got one, Alan.

Facts are not Richard's thing. He much rather just make up some wacky tale and subsequent ridicule it.
Asking Richard for an answer is the same as asking Oswald for a loan.

Indeed so, Mr Weidmann-------------------the Warren Gullibles are a funny bunch. You make a claim and they say 'You've no evidence!'. You show them evidence and they say 'No way would your evil conspirators have allowed this evidence to exist therefore it's not evidence!'

[Alan Ford]

HA HA HA.

So you can't explain the information and dates on the document? Got it, Mr Smith. Another triumph for you! 

[Richard Smith]

So you can't explain the information and dates on the document? Got it, Mr Smith. Another triumph for you! 

Can you explain why the authorities who you falsely believe framed Oswald and successfully suppressed his curtain rods would suddenly months later on their own motion bring them to light and even test them for fingerprints?  Can you make sense of that crazy narrative?  Why would they test curtain rods for Oswald's prints under that circumstance?  How would they forever silence the person who found them?  Do you even realize how absurd it is to suggest that is what happened? Let me guess.  No.  You are clinging desperately to one pedantic interpretation of a form and filling in the details to suit your fantasy.

[Alan Ford]

Can you explain why the authorities who you falsely believe framed Oswald and successfully suppressed his curtain rods would suddenly months later on their own motion bring them to light and even test them for fingerprints?  Can you make sense of that crazy narrative?  Why would they test curtain rods for Oswald's prints under that circumstance?  How would they forever silence the person who found them?  Do you even realize how absurd it is to suggest that is what happened? Let me guess.  No.  You are clinging desperately to one pedantic interpretation of a form and filling in the details to suit your fantasy.

~Grin~

Let us know when you come up with an explanation, Mr Smith!